Suppr超能文献

[Manual suture versus/or mechanical suture from the Austrian viewpoint].

作者信息

Kronberger L, Germann R

机构信息

Universitäts-Klinik für Chirurgie, Graz.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1987;372:89-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01297796.

Abstract

A general inquiry was made at surgical units and university clinics in Austria about the anastomosis techniques used between 1980 to 1985. The result was that in 90.3% the suture was made by hand and in 9.7% by machine. The first mentioned was performed as double row inverting suture by 66% of our surgeons, and only in 30% as an all-layer suture. The stapler-technique was mostly preferred for the oesophago-jejunostomy and the high and lower resection of the rectum. A leakage of the suture line was observed in 3.9% after sewing by hand and in 6.3% after stapling. The total lethality finally was 1.4% for hand made suture and 1.8% for apparative suture.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验