• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
2
3
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
4
The cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylaxis of headache in adults with chronic migraine in the UK.在英国,应用肉毒毒素 A 预防慢性偏头痛成人头痛的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):877-87. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.802694. Epub 2013 May 22.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX(®)) for the management of urinary incontinence in adults with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a UK perspective.成人神经源性逼尿肌过度活动所致尿失禁管理中使用A型肉毒毒素(保妥适®)的成本效益分析:英国视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Apr;33(4):381-93. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0245-8.
6
Venetoclax for Treating Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.维奈托克治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病:NICE 单技术评估的循证评估组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):399-406. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0599-9.
7
Preventive drug treatments for adults with chronic migraine: a systematic review with economic modelling.慢性偏头痛成人的预防性药物治疗:系统评价与经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(63):1-329. doi: 10.3310/AYWA5297.
8
9
Cost-effectiveness of rimegepant oral lyophilisate compared to best supportive care for the acute treatment of migraine in the UK.利马前列素口服冻干制剂对比最佳支持性护理用于英国偏头痛急性治疗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):627-643. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2340932. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

PMID:33237680
Abstract

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Ona A; Botox) powder for intramuscular injection solution is a neuromuscular paralytic agent derived from the fermentation of Clostridium botulinum type A and is one of several immunologically distinct serotypes of botulinum neurotoxin. It is indicated for the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (CM) who have headaches that occur at least 15 days per month and last four hours a day or longer. Ona A is administered as a minimum of 31 injections and a maximum of 39 injections of five Allergan units (U) per injection to the head and neck (total: 155 U to 195 U per administration). The recommended retreatment schedule is every 12 weeks. Ona A is available in 50 U, 100 U, and 200 U vial sizes, at a cost of $178.50, $357.00, and $714.00 per vial, respectively ($3.57 per U). CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee previously reviewed Ona A in 2014 for CM and provided a do-not-list recommendation due to significant limitations of the underlying clinical evidence. The manufacturer submitted a cost-utility analysis for this resubmission that was similar to the initial submission in 2014. In the current submission, the manufacturer compared Ona A with best supportive care (BSC) for the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with CM over a three-year time horizon. The manufacturer also compared Ona A with topiramate in a pairwise scenario analysis to account for changes in clinical practice since the original submission. The Markov model in the resubmission attempted to address some of the previous limitations identified by CADTH by considering additional health care resource use and costs, and added health states to model headache frequency changes in patients who discontinue treatment. The manufacturer modelled 13 health states: six headache frequency health states (0 to 3, 4 to 9, 10 to 14, 15 to 19, 20 to 23, and 24 to 28 headache days per month [HDPM]) for each treatment status (i.e., on treatment or discontinued treatment due to treatment failure) and a death state. Patients entered the model in the various health states based on headache frequency distribution from a pooled analysis of the PREEMPT trials, and transitioned between states every 12 weeks. Similar to the original submission, efficacy and discontinuation data from the PREEMPT trials were pooled and used to inform transition probability for Ona A and BSC; placebo was used as a proxy for BSC. The manufacturer modelled response-based discontinuation based on current clinical practice, in which patients who do not experience a reduction of at least 50% in headache frequency after the initial 24 weeks discontinue treatment. Patients discontinuing Ona A or BSC were assumed to be treated with BSC (patients treated with BSC effectively did not discontinue). The manufacturer reported that Ona A was associated with an additional cost of $3,430 and generated an additional 0.10 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with BSC, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $34,407 per QALY. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, the manufacturer reported that Ona A was associated with a 64% probability of being the optimal intervention compared with BSC.

摘要