• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莠去津原药及其与草甘膦复配制剂在土壤中的吸附机制。

Adsorption mechanisms of atrazine isolated and mixed with glyphosate formulations in soil.

机构信息

Department of Agronomic, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Department of Crop Production, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242350. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242350
PMID:33237922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7688157/
Abstract

In Brazil, the atrazine has been applied frequently to join with glyphosate to control resistant biotypes and weed tolerant species to glyphosate. However, there are no studies about atrazine's behavior in soil when applied in admixture with glyphosate. Knowledge of atrazine's sorption and desorption mixed with glyphosate is necessary because the lower sorption and higher desorption may increase the leaching and runoff of pesticides, reaching groundwaters and rivers. Thereby, the objective of this study was to evaluate the adsorption mechanisms of atrazine when isolated and mixed with glyphosate formulations in a Red-Yellow Latosol. The maximum adsorbed amount of atrazine in equilibrium (qe) was not altered due to glyphosate formulations. The time to reach equilibrium was shortest when atrazine was mixed with the Roundup Ready® (te = 4.3 hours) due to the higher adsorption velocity (k2 = 2.3 mg min-1) in the soil. The highest sorption of atrazine occurred when mixed with the Roundup WG®, with the Freundlich sorption coefficient (Kf) equal to 2.51 and 2.43 for both formulation concentrations. However, other glyphosate formulations did not affect the sorption of atrazine. The desorption of atrazine was high for all treatments, with values close to 80% of the initial adsorbed amount, without differences among isolated and mixed treatments. The change in the velocity and capacity of sorption for the atrazine mixed with some glyphosate formulations indicates that further studies should be conducted to identify the mechanisms involved in this process.

摘要

在巴西,莠去津经常与草甘膦联合使用,以控制抗草甘膦生物型和耐草甘膦杂草。然而,目前还没有关于莠去津与草甘膦混合使用时在土壤中行为的研究。了解莠去津与草甘膦混合时的吸附和解吸情况是必要的,因为较低的吸附和较高的解吸可能会增加农药的淋溶和径流,从而到达地下水和河流。因此,本研究的目的是评估莠去津在单独使用和与草甘膦制剂混合使用时在红壤黄壤中的吸附机制。由于草甘膦制剂的存在,莠去津在平衡时的最大吸附量(qe)没有改变。当莠去津与农达®(te = 4.3 小时)混合时,达到平衡的时间最短,这是由于土壤中更高的吸附速度(k2 = 2.3 mg min-1)。当莠去津与 Roundup WG®混合时,莠去津的吸附量最高,两种制剂浓度的 Freundlich 吸附系数(Kf)分别为 2.51 和 2.43。然而,其他草甘膦制剂并不影响莠去津的吸附。所有处理的莠去津解吸率都很高,接近初始吸附量的 80%,单独和混合处理之间没有差异。莠去津与某些草甘膦制剂混合后吸附速度和容量的变化表明,应该进行进一步的研究以确定涉及该过程的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/1922e3530c3c/pone.0242350.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/d4ab7dd6fc20/pone.0242350.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/c293281d4747/pone.0242350.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/91ba5cae19f8/pone.0242350.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/34a0ff6c7620/pone.0242350.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/1922e3530c3c/pone.0242350.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/d4ab7dd6fc20/pone.0242350.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/c293281d4747/pone.0242350.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/91ba5cae19f8/pone.0242350.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/34a0ff6c7620/pone.0242350.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1423/7688157/1922e3530c3c/pone.0242350.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Adsorption mechanisms of atrazine isolated and mixed with glyphosate formulations in soil.莠去津原药及其与草甘膦复配制剂在土壤中的吸附机制。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242350. eCollection 2020.
2
Adsorption of glyphosate on Brazilian subtropical soils rich in iron and aluminum oxides.草甘膦在富含铁铝氧化物的巴西亚热带土壤上的吸附。
J Environ Sci Health B. 2019;54(11):906-914. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2019.1644947. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Sorption and desorption of glyphosate in Mollisols and Ultisols soils of Argentina.阿根廷软土和老成土中草甘膦的吸附与解吸
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Oct;36(10):2587-2592. doi: 10.1002/etc.3851. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Laboratory and lysimeter studies of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in a sand and a clay soil.在沙土和粘壤土中进行的草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸的实验室和渗滤池研究。
J Environ Qual. 2011 Jan-Feb;40(1):98-108. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0179.
5
Impact of soil primary size fractions on sorption and desorption of atrazine on organo-mineral fractions.土壤初级粒径组分对阿特拉津在有机-矿物组分上吸附和解吸的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Mar;22(6):4396-405. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3684-z. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
6
Influence of Glyphosate Formulations on the Behavior of Sulfentrazone in Soil in Mixed Applications.草甘膦制剂对混施时土壤中嗪酮行为的影响。
Toxics. 2020 Dec 17;8(4):123. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040123.
7
Adsorption-desorption behavior of atrazine on agricultural soils in China.莠去津在我国农业土壤上的吸附-解吸行为。
J Environ Sci (China). 2017 Jul;57:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
8
Characterization of the atrazine sorption process on Andisol and Ultisol volcanic ash-derived soils: kinetic parameters and the contribution of humic fractions.在安山岩和玄武岩风成土上莠去津吸附过程的特征:动力学参数和腐殖质分数的贡献。
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Jul 3;61(26):6150-60. doi: 10.1021/jf400950d. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
9
Sorption-desorption behavior of pesticides and their degradation products in volcanic and nonvolcanic soils: interpretation of interactions through two-way principal component analysis.农药及其降解产物在火山土和非火山土中的吸附-解吸行为:通过双向主成分分析解释相互作用
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(11):8576-85. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-4036-8. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
10
Sorption-desorption of atrazine and diuron in soils from southern Brazil.巴西南部土壤中阿特拉津和敌草隆的吸附-解吸作用
J Environ Sci Health B. 2006;41(5):605-21. doi: 10.1080/03601230600701767.

引用本文的文献

1
Adsorption-desorption of Atrazine with 9 Agricultural Soils in China.中国 9 种农业土壤中莠去津的吸附-解吸。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2024 Jan 31;112(2):32. doi: 10.1007/s00128-023-03827-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Metagenomic analysis reveals mechanisms of atrazine biodegradation promoted by tree species.宏基因组分析揭示了树种促进莠去津生物降解的机制。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Dec;267:115636. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115636. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
2
Simultaneously enhanced removal and stepwise recovery of atrazine and Pb(II) from water using β-cyclodextrin functionalized cellulose: Characterization, adsorptive performance and mechanism exploration.同时使用β-环糊精功能化纤维素从水中去除和逐步回收莠去津和 Pb(II):表征、吸附性能和机理探讨。
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Dec 5;400:123142. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123142. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Use of neural networks to estimate the sorption and desorption coefficients of herbicides: A case study of diuron, hexazinone, and sulfometuron-methyl in Brazil.
利用神经网络估算除草剂的吸附和解吸系数:巴西案例研究中的敌草隆、六嗪酮和甲磺隆。
Chemosphere. 2019 Dec;236:124333. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Persistence of picloram in soil with different vegetation managements.不同植被管理下土壤中草甘膦的持久性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(24):23986-23991. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2443-y. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
5
Sorption, transport and biodegradation - An insight into bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soil.吸附、迁移和生物降解——了解土壤中持久性有机污染物的生物可利用性。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:1154-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.089. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
6
Identification and functional analysis of a new glyphosate resistance gene from a fungus cDNA library.从真菌cDNA文库中鉴定并对一个新的抗草甘膦基因进行功能分析。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2017 Aug;140:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
7
Behaviour of glyphosate in a reservoir and the surrounding agricultural soils.草甘膦在水库及其周边农田土壤中的行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Sep 1;593-594:787-795. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.202. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Influence of commercial formulation on leaching of four pesticides through soil.商业制剂对四种农药通过土壤浸出的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:1573-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.076. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
9
Estimated Levels of Environmental Contamination and Health Risk Assessment for Herbicides and Insecticides in Surface Water of Ceará, Brazil.巴西塞阿拉州地表水中除草剂和杀虫剂的环境污染估计水平及健康风险评估
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016 Jan;96(1):90-5. doi: 10.1007/s00128-015-1686-2. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Competitive adsorption of heavy metals onto sesame straw biochar in aqueous solutions.水溶液中重金属离子在芝麻秸秆生物炭上的竞争吸附
Chemosphere. 2016 Jan;142:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.093. Epub 2015 Jun 14.