• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无导线起搏在老年人中的应用:新事物永不过时。

Leadless pacing in the elderly: never too old for something new.

机构信息

Second Department of Cardiology, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa.

出版信息

Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020 Nov 20;90(4). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2020.1255.

DOI:10.4081/monaldi.2020.1255
PMID:33238697
Abstract

Rates of cardiac pacemaker implantation rise with age, and, meanwhile, elderly patient may be at great risk of complications, as pneumothorax, lead perforation, or pocket dehiscence. The use of leadless pacemaker could overcome peri- and post-procedural complications related to the presence of transvenous leads and pocket. The study aims to investigate feasibility and outcomes of Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (M-TPS) implantation in elderly, which represents a challenge for conventional cardiac pacing. Between May 2014 and July 2019, 109 patients (88 males, mean age 77.71±9.68 years) underwent M-TPS implantation at our Center, targeting a non-apical site of delivery when feasible. Study population was divided into two groups according to age (group 1 <79 years vs group 2 group 2 ≥80 years). The outcome evaluation included electrical performance at hospital discharge, and during follow-up. In 46/109 cases (34 males, 73.91%) M-TPS was implanted in patients older than 80 years. There were no statistically significant differences between groups for demographics characteristics, except for age. The procedure was performed via the right femoral access in 102/109 cases and was successful in all cases, with no device-related events. No differences were observed between groups in procedure duration, single device delivery, electrical performance at implant and at 12 month F-U. MTP-S implant is an effective and safe procedure in elderly patients, with similar electrical performance and outcome compared with younger patients at mid-term follow-up.

摘要

心脏起搏器植入率随年龄增长而上升,而老年患者可能面临气胸、导线穿孔或囊袋裂开等并发症的高风险。无导线起搏器的使用可以克服与经静脉导线和囊袋相关的围手术期和术后并发症。本研究旨在探讨 Micra 经导管起搏系统(M-TPS)在老年患者中的植入的可行性和结果,这对传统心脏起搏是一个挑战。2014 年 5 月至 2019 年 7 月,我们中心对 109 例患者(88 例男性,平均年龄 77.71±9.68 岁)进行了 M-TPS 植入,当可行时,目标是将输送部位放置于非心尖部位。根据年龄将研究人群分为两组(组 1 <79 岁,组 2 ≥80 岁)。出院时和随访期间评估电性能。在 109 例患者中,46 例(34 例男性,73.91%)年龄大于 80 岁。除年龄外,两组在人口统计学特征方面无统计学差异。102/109 例患者经右股动脉入路进行手术,所有患者均成功植入,无器械相关事件。两组在手术时间、单个器械输送、植入时和 12 个月随访时的电性能方面无差异。在中期随访中,与年轻患者相比,MTP-S 植入在老年患者中是一种有效且安全的方法,电性能和结果相似。

相似文献

1
Leadless pacing in the elderly: never too old for something new.无导线起搏在老年人中的应用:新事物永不过时。
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020 Nov 20;90(4). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2020.1255.
2
Leadless pacing with Micra TPS: A comparison between right ventricular outflow tract, mid-septal, and apical implant sites.采用Micra TPS进行无导线起搏:右心室流出道、室间隔中部和心尖植入部位的比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Oct;30(10):2002-2011. doi: 10.1111/jce.14083. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation: patient characteristics and outcomes.经左侧股静脉入路植入无导线起搏器:患者特征与结局。
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1456-1461. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab083.
4
[Initial implantation experience and short-term follow-up results of implanting leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system].[无导线心腔内导管起搏系统植入的初始经验及短期随访结果]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 24;48(10):866-870. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200305-00160.
5
Leadless pacemaker implantation via the internal jugular vein.经颈内静脉植入无导线起搏器。
Europace. 2024 Aug 3;26(8). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae199.
6
Monocentric experience of leadless pacing with focus on challenging cases for conventional pacemaker.无导线起搏的单中心经验,重点关注传统起搏器的挑战性病例。
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Oct;73(5):459-468. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1410351. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Combined Leadless Pacemaker and Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Single Femoral Puncture Approach.经单一股静脉入路行无导线起搏器联合房室结消融治疗心房颤动的安全性和有效性结果。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 May;29(5):759-765. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.100. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
Micra pacemaker implant after cardiac implantable electronic device extraction: feasibility and long-term outcomes.心脏植入式电子设备取出后植入 Micra 起搏器:可行性和长期结果。
Europace. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):1229-1236. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz160.
9
The jugular approach for leadless pacing: A novel and safe alternative.无导线起搏的颈静脉入路:一种新颖且安全的替代方法。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;45(10):1248-1254. doi: 10.1111/pace.14587. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
10
Leadless pacing using the transcatheter pacing system (Micra TPS) in the real world: initial Swiss experience from the Romandie region.经导管起搏系统(Micra TPS)在真实世界中的无导线起搏应用:瑞士罗曼德地区的初步经验。
Europace. 2019 Feb 1;21(2):275-280. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy195.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless pacing: a comprehensive review.无导线起搏:全面综述。
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jun 2;46(21):1979-1990. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf119.
2
Optimizing cardiac device management: Leadless pacemaker implantation together with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead in a diaphragmatic stimulation case.优化心脏设备管理:在膈肌刺激病例中同时植入无导线起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器导线
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024 May 9;10(7):494-497. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.04.016. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
The feasibility of leadless pacemaker implantation in nonagenarians: case report and literature review.
百岁老人植入无导线起搏器的可行性:病例报告及文献综述
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Aug 28;19(8):626-630. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.08.008.