• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较不同的多参数评分在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中的风险分层。

Comparison among different multiparametric scores for risk stratification in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

机构信息

IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Spa SB, Italy.

Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):12-18. doi: 10.1177/2047487320962990.

DOI:10.1177/2047487320962990
PMID:33238734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7691563/
Abstract

Heart failure is a serious condition with high prevalence (about 2% in the adult population in developed countries, and more than 8% in patients older than 75 years). About 3-5% of hospital admissions are linked with heart failure incidents. The guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure have identified individual markers in patients with heart failure, including demographic data, aetiology, comorbidities, clinical, radiological, haemodynamic, echocardiographic and biochemical parameters. Several scoring systems have been proposed to identify adverse events, such as destabilizations, re-hospitalizations and mortality. This article reviews scoring systems for heart failure prognostication, with particular mention of those models with exercise tolerance objective definition. Although most of the models include readily available clinical information, quite a few of them comprise circulating levels of natriuretic peptides and a more objective evaluation of exercise tolerance. A literature review was also conducted to (a) identify heart failure risk-prediction models, (b) assess statistical approach, and (c) identify common variables.

摘要

心力衰竭是一种患病率较高的严重疾病(在发达国家的成年人群中约为 2%,在 75 岁以上的患者中超过 8%)。约 3-5%的住院治疗与心力衰竭事件有关。欧洲心脏病学会关于急性和慢性心力衰竭的诊断和治疗指南确定了心力衰竭患者的个体标志物,包括人口统计学数据、病因、合并症、临床、影像学、血液动力学、超声心动图和生化参数。已经提出了几种评分系统来识别不良事件,如不稳定、再住院和死亡。本文回顾了心力衰竭预后评分系统,特别提到了那些具有运动耐量客观定义的模型。尽管大多数模型都包含易于获得的临床信息,但其中相当一部分模型包含利钠肽的循环水平和对运动耐量的更客观评估。还进行了文献回顾,以(a)确定心力衰竭风险预测模型,(b)评估统计方法,和(c)确定常见变量。

相似文献

1
Comparison among different multiparametric scores for risk stratification in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.比较不同的多参数评分在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中的风险分层。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):12-18. doi: 10.1177/2047487320962990.
2
Risk stratification in heart failure with mild reduced ejection fraction.心力衰竭伴轻度射血分数降低的风险分层。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):59-64. doi: 10.1177/2047487320951104.
3
The MECKI score initiative: Development and state of the art.MECKI 评分倡议:发展与现状。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):5-11. doi: 10.1177/2047487320959010.
4
[Clinical scores in chronic heart failure: does an ideal score exist?].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2015 Jan;16(1):21-30. doi: 10.1714/1776.19244.
5
Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Exercise Capacity and Mortality in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From Cardiopulmonary Stress Testing.心房颤动对射血分数保留心力衰竭患者运动能力和死亡率的影响:心肺应激测试的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(11):e006662. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006662.
6
Future developments in the MECKI score initiative.MECKI 评分计划的未来发展。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):72-75. doi: 10.1177/2047487320962983.
7
Prognostic Value of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure With Reduced, Midrange, and Preserved Ejection Fraction.心肺运动试验在射血分数降低、中间范围和保留的心衰中的预后价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(11):e006000. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006000.
8
The MECKI score initiative: a successful and ongoing story.梅基(MECKI)评分倡议:一个成功且仍在持续发展的故事。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):3-4. doi: 10.1177/2047487320952692.
9
A moderate 500-m treadmill walk for estimating peak oxygen uptake in men with NYHA class I-II heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.通过适度的500米跑步机步行来评估纽约心脏协会心功能I-II级且左心室射血分数降低的男性的峰值摄氧量。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0801-9.
10
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as prognostic indicators: Comparisons among heart failure patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction.心肺运动试验作为预后指标:射血分数降低、中间范围和保留的心衰患者的比较。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Dec;24(18):1979-1987. doi: 10.1177/2047487317739079. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
V, Ve/V, and Cardiac Remodeling Correlate with Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcome in Heart Failure Patients.V、Ve/V与心脏重塑与心力衰竭患者的长期心血管结局相关。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 2;12(5):174. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050174.
2
Who is the Candidate? The Heart Transplant Evaluation Process.谁是候选人?心脏移植评估过程。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 May 15;21(3):13-24. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1512. eCollection 2025.
3
Discriminative Utility of Apelin-to-NT-Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Ratio for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.2型糖尿病患者中阿佩林与N末端B型利钠肽原比值对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的鉴别效用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Jan 12;9(1):23. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9010023.
4
Characteristics and outcomes of heart failure with recovered left ventricular ejection fraction.射血分数恢复的心力衰竭的特征和结局。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5383-5391. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13630. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
5
Novel biomarker-driven prognostic models to predict morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure: the EMPEROR-Reduced trial.新型生物标志物驱动的预后模型预测慢性心力衰竭患者的发病率和死亡率: EMPEROR-Reduced 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 14;42(43):4455-4464. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab579.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating risk prediction models for adults with heart failure: A systematic literature review.评估成人心力衰竭风险预测模型:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0224135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224135. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
3
Comparison of MAGGIC and MECKI risk scores to predict mortality after cardiac rehabilitation among Dutch heart failure patients.比较MAGGIC和MECKI风险评分以预测荷兰心力衰竭患者心脏康复后的死亡率。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(19):2126-2130. doi: 10.1177/2047487319865730. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Obesity and hemoglobin content impact peak oxygen uptake in human heart failure.肥胖和血红蛋白含量影响心力衰竭患者的峰值摄氧量。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Dec;25(18):1937-1946. doi: 10.1177/2047487318802695. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Prognostic significance of the echocardiographic estimate of pulmonary hypertension and of right ventricular dysfunction in acute decompensated heart failure. A pilot study in HFrEF patients.超声心动图估计肺动脉高压和右心室功能障碍对急性失代偿性心力衰竭预后的意义。HFrEF 患者的初步研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;271:301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.069. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
6
Performance of Prognostic Risk Scores in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Enrolled in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭长期注册研究中纳入的慢性心力衰竭患者预后风险评分的表现。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;6(6):452-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.02.001.
7
Comparison of cardiopulmonary-based risk models with a clinical heart failure risk model.基于心肺功能的风险模型与临床心力衰竭风险模型的比较。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):711-714. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1164. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Integrative Assessment of Congestion in Heart Failure Throughout the Patient Journey.心力衰竭患者全程充血的综合评估。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;6(4):273-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Multiparametric prognostic scores in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a long-term comparison.多参数预后评分在射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭中的应用:长期比较。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):700-710. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.989. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
10
Eighth annual INTERMACS report: Special focus on framing the impact of adverse events.第八年度 INTERMACS 报告:特别关注不良事件影响的构建。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 15.