Suppr超能文献

比较 qSOFA 评分、SOFA 评分和 SIRS 标准在预测外科中重症监护患者感染和死亡率中的应用。

Comparison of qSOFA score, SOFA score, and SIRS criteria for the prediction of infection and mortality among surgical intermediate and intensive care patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Street 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

German Center of Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Giessen/Marburg/Langen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 25;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00343-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is crucial to rapidly identify sepsis so that adequate treatment may be initiated. Accordingly, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the quick SOFA (qSOFA) scores are used to evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients, respectively. As demand for ICU beds rises, the intermediate care unit (IMCU) carries greater importance as a bridge between the ICU and the regular ward. This study aimed to examine the ability of SOFA and qSOFA scores to predict suspected infection and mortality in IMCU patients.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis included 13,780 surgical patients treated at the IMCU, ICU, or both between January 01, 2012, and September 30, 2018. Patients were screened for suspected infection (i.e., the commencement of broad-spectrum antibiotics) and then evaluated for the SOFA score, qSOFA score, and the 1992 defined systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria.

RESULTS

Suspected infection was detected in 1306 (18.3%) of IMCU, 1365 (35.5%) of ICU, and 1734 (62.0%) of IMCU/ICU encounters. Overall, 458 (3.3%) patients died (IMCU 45 [0.6%]; ICU 250 [6.5%]; IMCU/ICU 163 [5.8%]). All investigated scores failed to predict suspected infection independently of the analyzed subgroup. Regarding mortality prediction, the qSOFA score performed sufficiently within the IMCU cohort (AUCROC SIRS 0.72 [0.71-0.72]; SOFA 0.52 [0.51-0.53]; qSOFA 0.82 [0.79-0.84]), while the SOFA score was predictive in patients of the IMCU/ICU cohort (AUCROC SIRS 0.54 [0.53-0.54]; SOFA 0.73 [0.70-0.77]; qSOFA 0.59 [0.58-0.59]).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the assessed scores was sufficiently able to predict suspected infection in surgical ICU or IMCU patients. While the qSOFA score is appropriate for mortality prediction in IMCU patients, SOFA score prediction quality is increased in critically ill patients.

摘要

背景

快速识别脓毒症至关重要,以便及时开始适当的治疗。因此,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和快速 SOFA(qSOFA)评分分别用于评估重症监护病房(ICU)和非 ICU 患者。随着对 ICU 床位的需求增加,中间护理单元(IMCU)作为 ICU 和普通病房之间的桥梁变得更加重要。本研究旨在探讨 SOFA 和 qSOFA 评分预测 IMCU 患者疑似感染和死亡率的能力。

方法

回顾性数据分析纳入了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 30 日期间在 IMCU、ICU 或两者均接受治疗的 13780 例外科患者。对疑似感染(即开始使用广谱抗生素)的患者进行筛查,然后评估 SOFA 评分、qSOFA 评分和 1992 年定义的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准。

结果

在 IMCU(1306[18.3%])、ICU(1365[35.5%])和 IMCU/ICU(1734[62.0%])中,共检测到疑似感染 1306 例。总体而言,458(3.3%)例患者死亡(IMCU 45[0.6%];ICU 250[6.5%];IMCU/ICU 163[5.8%])。所有研究的评分均未能独立于分析的亚组预测疑似感染。在预测死亡率方面,qSOFA 评分在 IMCU 队列中表现良好(AUCROC SIRS 0.72[0.71-0.72];SOFA 0.52[0.51-0.53];qSOFA 0.82[0.79-0.84]),而 SOFA 评分在 IMCU/ICU 队列中的预测能力更强(AUCROC SIRS 0.54[0.53-0.54];SOFA 0.73[0.70-0.77];qSOFA 0.59[0.58-0.59])。

结论

在所评估的评分中,没有一个能够充分预测外科 ICU 或 IMCU 患者的疑似感染。qSOFA 评分适用于 IMCU 患者的死亡率预测,而 SOFA 评分在危重症患者中的预测质量更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fac0/7687806/53438c102f0f/13017_2020_343_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验