Suppr超能文献

职业体力活动如何影响健康?158 项观察性研究中 23 项健康结果的伞式综述。

How does occupational physical activity influence health? An umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1474-1481. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102587.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physical activity (PA) has substantial benefits across a range of health outcomes. There is uncertainty about the PA-specific health effects, and in particular, the occupational domain. In this umbrella review, we synthesised available evidence on the associations between occupational PA (OPA) and health-related outcomes (including cancer, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease). This work informed the development of WHO's guidelines on PA and sedentary behaviour (2020).

DESIGN

Umbrella review of systematic reviews.

DATA SOURCE

We performed a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Sportdiscuss from database inception to 2 December 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We included systematic reviews if they contained a quantitative assessment of OPA and its relationship with at least one health-related outcome.

RESULTS

We summarised the evidence of 17 reviews covering 23 unique health-related outcomes. We graded most evidence as low or very low, or moderate quality. We found health benefits for those engaging in high versus low OPA for multiple cancer outcomes (including colon and prostate), ischaemic stroke, coronary heart disease and mental health (ie, mental well-being and life satisfaction). High OPA was associated with unfavourable health outcomes for all-cause mortality in men, mental ill health (ie, depression and anxiety), osteoarthritis, and sleep quality and duration.

CONCLUSIONS

We found favourable associations for most health-related outcomes with high OPA levels, but we also found some evidence for unfavourable associations due to high OPA levels. At this point, there is a need for better quality evidence to provide a unequivocal statement on the health effects of OPA.

摘要

目的

身体活动(PA)对一系列健康结果都有显著益处。PA 对健康的具体影响存在不确定性,尤其是在职业领域。在本次伞式综述中,我们综合了现有证据,评估了职业体力活动(OPA)与健康相关结局(包括癌症、全因死亡率和心血管疾病)之间的关联。这为世卫组织关于体力活动和久坐行为的指南(2020 年)的制定提供了信息。

设计

对系统综述的伞式综述。

数据来源

我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL 和 Sportdiscuss 数据库中进行了文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立到 2019 年 12 月 2 日。

纳入研究的标准

如果系统综述包含对 OPA 及其与至少一种健康相关结局关系的定量评估,我们将其纳入。

结果

我们总结了 17 项综述的证据,这些综述涵盖了 23 种独特的健康相关结局。我们将大多数证据评为低或极低质量,或中等质量。我们发现,对于多种癌症结局(包括结肠癌和前列腺癌)、缺血性中风、冠心病和心理健康(即心理幸福感和生活满意度),从事高 OPA 与低 OPA 的人相比,有健康获益。高 OPA 与男性全因死亡率、心理健康不良(即抑郁和焦虑)、骨关节炎以及睡眠质量和时长呈不利健康结局相关。

结论

我们发现高 OPA 水平与大多数健康相关结局呈有利关联,但我们也发现一些证据表明高 OPA 水平与不利关联有关。目前,需要更高质量的证据来对 OPA 的健康影响作出明确的陈述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验