• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新选定 (石竹科漆姑草亚科)该属模式种 的选模式。

Re-lectotypification of , the type of the genus (Alsineae, Caryophyllaceae).

作者信息

Xue Bine, Wang Long-Yuan, Yao Gang

机构信息

College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering Guangzhou China.

College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.

出版信息

PhytoKeys. 2020 Nov 13;166:129-134. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.166.58710. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3897/phytokeys.166.58710
PMID:33239960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7679349/
Abstract

The genus Pusalkar & D.K. Singh was described in 2015 and the specimen deposited in K (K000742193) was designated as the lectotype of its type species (Edgew.) Pusalkar & D.K. Singh (≡ Edgew.). Nevertheless, (K000742193) is actually the type of (Edgew.) Pusalkar & D.K. Singh (≡ Edgew.). Thus the lectotypification of was problematic and a re-lectotypification for this species is needed. One of the syntypes of collected from Kashmir (, K000742189) is selected here as its lectotype. Morphologically, and can be easily distinguished from each other by their different morphology of indumentum, disc gland and sepals, as well as the color of petals.

摘要

Pusalkar & D.K. Singh属在2015年被描述,保存在K(K000742193)的标本被指定为其模式种(Edgeworth)Pusalkar & D.K. Singh(≡ Edgeworth)的选型。然而,(K000742193)实际上是(Edgeworth)Pusalkar & D.K. Singh(≡ Edgeworth)的模式标本。因此,该属的选型存在问题,需要对该物种进行重新选型。这里从克什米尔采集的该物种的一个合模式标本(,K000742189)被选为其选型。在形态上,该物种和另一个物种可以通过它们不同的毛被形态、花盘腺体和萼片以及花瓣颜色很容易地相互区分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/4d18755ff91e/phytokeys-166-129-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/ea111ccabd9a/phytokeys-166-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/9644311e08a3/phytokeys-166-129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/417d5e825e6d/phytokeys-166-129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/4d18755ff91e/phytokeys-166-129-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/ea111ccabd9a/phytokeys-166-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/9644311e08a3/phytokeys-166-129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/417d5e825e6d/phytokeys-166-129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e927/7679349/4d18755ff91e/phytokeys-166-129-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Re-lectotypification of , the type of the genus (Alsineae, Caryophyllaceae).重新选定 (石竹科漆姑草亚科)该属模式种 的选模式。
PhytoKeys. 2020 Nov 13;166:129-134. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.166.58710. eCollection 2020.
2
Chloroplast Genome Sequences and Phylogenetic Analysis of Eight Newly Sequenced Caryophyllaceae Species.八个新测序的石竹科物种的叶绿体基因组序列和系统发育分析。
J AOAC Int. 2024 Mar 1;107(2):345-353. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad129.
3
Lectotypification of the name Mitt. (Plagiotheciaceae), a basionym of (Mitt.) A. Jaeger.名称 Mitt.(青藓科)的选模式指定,(Mitt.) A. 耶格的基原异名。
PhytoKeys. 2020 Aug 7;155:141-153. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.155.51469. eCollection 2020.
4
Invalid lectotypification for Boulenger, 1906 (Siluriformes, Mochokidae) by Poll (1971), and the designation of a new lectotype.
Zookeys. 2023 Oct 27;1183:65-72. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1183.111868. eCollection 2023.
5
Lectotypification of five names in the genus (Caryophyllaceae) in China.中国石竹科(Caryophyllaceae)该属五个名称的后选模式指定。
PhytoKeys. 2020 Dec 21;170:71-81. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.170.59527. eCollection 2020.
6
Phylogenetic estimation and morphological evolution of Alsineae (Caryophyllaceae) shed new insight into the taxonomic status of the genus .繁缕族(石竹科)的系统发育估计和形态演化对该属的分类地位有了新的认识。
Plant Divers. 2020 Nov 7;43(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.11.001. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
New combinations in Odontostemma (Caryophyllaceae).齿瓣景天属(石竹科)的新组合
PhytoKeys. 2016 Jun 2(63):77-97. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.63.8181. eCollection 2016.
8
Lectotypification of six names in the genus (Orchidaceae) described from J. J. Linden's collection.对从J. J. 林登的收藏中描述的该属(兰科)六个名称的选定模式标本进行鉴定。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Sep 24;182:93-106. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.182.68782. eCollection 2021.
9
sp. nov. and lectotypification of (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) from Asia.亚洲豆科蝶形花亚科某属新种及模式指定
PhytoKeys. 2021 Mar 19;175:55-65. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.175.57759. eCollection 2021.
10
The taxonomic identity of three varieties of (Vanilleae, Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae) in Japan.日本三种香草(香草族,香子兰亚族,兰科)的分类学鉴定。
PhytoKeys. 2018 Jan 10(92):17-35. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.92.21657. eCollection 2018.