• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术的发展历程:从同情性治疗到低风险病例。

The path of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from compassionate to low-risk cases.

作者信息

Tamburino Corrado, Valvo Roberto, Crioscione Enrico, Reddavid Claudia, Picci Andrea, Costa Giuliano, Barbanti Marco

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Nov 18;22(Suppl L):L140-L145. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa154. eCollection 2020 Nov.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/suaa154
PMID:33239989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7673604/
Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common valvular diseases in developed countries. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as alternative to medical treatment or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in all symptomatic patients with severe AS. In 2002, Cribier performed the first human TAVI through a trans-septal approach in a 57-year-old man with severe AS. Since then, several trials have compared TAVI vs. SAVR over the years. Today, it is superior in terms of mortality to medical therapy in extreme-risk patients, non-inferior or superior to surgery in high-risk patients, and non-inferior to surgery and even superior when transfemoral access is possible in intermediate-risk patients. Interesting results emerged from the latest multicentre trials involving patients with severe AS who were at low risk for death from surgery, demonstrating that this therapy will be offered to younger people in the next future.

摘要

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是发达国家最常见的瓣膜疾病之一。经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为所有有症状的重度AS患者替代药物治疗或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的选择。2002年,克里比埃通过经房间隔途径为一名57岁的重度AS男性实施了首例人体TAVI。从那时起,多年来已有多项试验对TAVI与SAVR进行了比较。如今,在极高风险患者中,TAVI在死亡率方面优于药物治疗;在高风险患者中,TAVI不劣于或优于手术治疗;在中风险患者中,若可行经股动脉途径,TAVI不劣于手术治疗,甚至更具优势。最新的多中心试验涉及手术死亡风险较低的重度AS患者,得出了有趣的结果,表明在未来这种治疗方法将应用于更年轻的患者。

相似文献

1
The path of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from compassionate to low-risk cases.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的发展历程:从同情性治疗到低风险病例。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Nov 18;22(Suppl L):L140-L145. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa154. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in the intermediate surgical risk population.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危外科手术风险人群的成本效益比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;294:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险中等的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Feb;27(2):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Minimalistic Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Open Vascular Vs. Fully Percutaneous Approach.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的极简方法:开放血管法与完全经皮法
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2019 Oct 1;40(2):5-14. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0009.
7
Factors influencing the choice between transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients younger than 80 years: Results from the OBSERVANT study.影响 80 岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与手术治疗选择的因素:来自 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):E186-E195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28447. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
8
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
9
Propensity-Matched Comparison of Evolut-R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Surgery in Intermediate-Risk Patients (from the SURTAVI Trial).Evolut-R 经导管主动脉瓣置换术与手术治疗中危患者的倾向评分匹配比较(来自 SURTAVI 试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 15;131:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.051. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
[Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Sever Aortic Valve Stenosis].经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄
Kyobu Geka. 2018 Sep;71(10):815-820.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of Imaging Assessment Criteria in Predicting the Need for Post-Dilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis.影像评估标准在预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用自膨胀生物假体后扩张需求中的重要性
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Aug 1;12(8):296. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12080296.
2
Renal impairment in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictors, and prognostic significance.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的肾功能损害:发生率、预测因素及预后意义。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04982-4.
3
Pre-procedural abnormal von Willebrand factor function predicts clinical outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.
术前血管性血友病因子功能异常可预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的临床结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 23;12:1576921. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1576921. eCollection 2025.
4
When brain and heart collide: a deeper dive into treatment pathways of stroke complicating TAVI.当大脑与心脏碰撞:深入探究经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)并发中风的治疗途径
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Jul;40(3):657-668. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01121-w. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
5
Common Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review from 2009 to 2024.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后房颤的常见危险因素:2009年至2024年的系统评价
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 28;12(3):90. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030090.
6
Similar clinical outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床结局相似。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;9:947197. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.947197. eCollection 2022.
低手术风险患者行经导管和外科生物瓣主动脉瓣膜的耐久性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.083.
4
5-Year Outcomes of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients.高危患者自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 5 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2687-2696. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2146. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
5
Standardized Definition of Structural Valve Degeneration for Surgical and Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.经导管主动脉瓣生物瓣和外科生物瓣结构性瓣叶衰败的标准化定义。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 23;137(4):388-399. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030729.
6
Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).评估经导管和外科主动脉生物瓣膜长期耐久性时结构恶化和瓣膜功能衰竭的标准化定义:欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)的共识声明,得到欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)认可
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3382-3390. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303.
7
Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.中危患者的外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1321-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
9
5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄高危患者的 5 年结果(PARTNER 1):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2477-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60308-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
10
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在高危患者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 9;364(23):2187-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510. Epub 2011 Jun 5.