• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不利的社会环境会影响食物选择吗?来自三项实验室实验的证据。

Do Disadvantageous Social Contexts Influence Food Choice? Evidence From Three Laboratory Experiments.

作者信息

Rramani Qëndresa, Gerhardt Holger, Grote Xenia, Zhao Weihua, Schultz Johannes, Weber Bernd

机构信息

Center for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 6;11:575170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575170. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575170
PMID:33240164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7677191/
Abstract

Increasing rates of obesity have fueled interest in the factors underlying food choice. While epidemiological studies report that disadvantaged social groups exhibit a higher incidence of obesity, causal evidence for an effect of social contexts on food choice remains scarce. To further our knowledge, we experimentally investigated the effect of disadvantageous social context on food choice in healthy, non-dieting participants. We used three established experimental methods to generate social contexts of different valence in controlled laboratory settings: (i) receiving varying amounts of money in a Dictator Game (DG; = 40), (ii) being included or excluded in a Cyberball Game (CBG; = 35), and (iii) performing well, average, or poorly in a response time ranking task (RTR; = 81). Following exposure to a particular social context, participants made pairwise choices between food items that involved a conflict between perceived taste and health attributes. In line with previous research, stronger dispositional self-control (assessed via a questionnaire) was associated with healthier food choices. As expected, being treated unfairly in the DG, being excluded in the CBG, and performing poorly in the RTR led to negative emotions. However, we did not find an effect of the induced social context on food choice in any of the experiments, even when taking into account individual differences in participants' responses to the social context. Our results suggest that-at least in controlled laboratory environments-the influence of disadvantageous social contexts on food choice is limited.

摘要

肥胖率的不断上升引发了人们对食物选择背后因素的兴趣。虽然流行病学研究报告称,社会弱势群体的肥胖发病率较高,但社会环境对食物选择产生影响的因果证据仍然很少。为了增进我们的了解,我们通过实验研究了不利社会环境对健康、非节食参与者食物选择的影响。我们使用了三种既定的实验方法,在可控的实验室环境中营造不同效价的社会环境:(i)在独裁者博弈(DG;n = 40)中获得不同数量的金钱,(ii)在网络投球游戏(CBG;n = 35)中被纳入或排除,以及(iii)在反应时间排名任务(RTR;n = 81)中表现出色、表现一般或表现不佳。在接触特定的社会环境后,参与者在涉及味觉和健康属性冲突的食物项目之间进行两两选择。与先前的研究一致,更强的特质性自我控制(通过问卷调查评估)与更健康的食物选择相关。正如预期的那样,在DG中受到不公平对待、在CBG中被排除以及在RTR中表现不佳会导致负面情绪。然而,我们在任何实验中都没有发现诱导的社会环境对食物选择有影响,即使考虑到参与者对社会环境反应的个体差异。我们的结果表明,至少在可控的实验室环境中,不利社会环境对食物选择的影响是有限的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/7df782de73bc/fpsyg-11-575170-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/36573c0e0df1/fpsyg-11-575170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/d8ea3676202a/fpsyg-11-575170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/f2121748853b/fpsyg-11-575170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/ffc6bf813589/fpsyg-11-575170-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/7df782de73bc/fpsyg-11-575170-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/36573c0e0df1/fpsyg-11-575170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/d8ea3676202a/fpsyg-11-575170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/f2121748853b/fpsyg-11-575170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/ffc6bf813589/fpsyg-11-575170-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a05/7677191/7df782de73bc/fpsyg-11-575170-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Disadvantageous Social Contexts Influence Food Choice? Evidence From Three Laboratory Experiments.不利的社会环境会影响食物选择吗?来自三项实验室实验的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 6;11:575170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575170. eCollection 2020.
2
When do healthiness and liking drive children's food choices? The influence of social context and weight status.健康和喜好何时会影响儿童的食物选择?社会环境和体重状况的影响。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:466-473. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
4
Influence of social norms and palatability on amount consumed and food choice.社会规范和适口性对食物摄入量及食物选择的影响。
Appetite. 2004 Apr;42(2):227-37. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.12.001.
5
We, Them, and It: Dictator Game Offers Depend on Hierarchical Social Status, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Dominance.我们、他们与它:独裁者博弈中的提议取决于等级社会地位、人工智能和社会支配地位。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 23;11:541756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.541756. eCollection 2020.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Fair play doesn't matter: MEP modulation as a neurophysiological signature of status quo bias in economic interactions.公平竞争无关紧要:MEP 调制是经济互动中现状偏见的神经生理特征。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.056. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
8
If I Share With You, Will You Share With Me? A Quasi-Experimental Study on Social Anxiety and Self-Disclosure in Dictator Game.如果我与你分享,你会与我分享吗?独裁者博弈中社交焦虑与自我表露的一项准实验研究。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Aug 18:332941241275611. doi: 10.1177/00332941241275611.
9
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans.社会评价诱导的淀粉酶升高与人类独裁者博弈中的经济决策
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007 Oct;28(5):662-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The overweight and obesity transition from the wealthy to the poor in low- and middle-income countries: A survey of household data from 103 countries.中低收入国家的超重和肥胖问题从富裕人群向贫困人群转移:来自 103 个国家的家庭调查数据。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 27;16(11):e1002968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002968. eCollection 2019 Nov.
2
Global Implementation of Obesity Prevention Policies: a Review of Progress, Politics, and the Path Forward.全球肥胖预防政策的实施情况:进展、政治和前进道路的回顾。
Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):504-516. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00358-w.
3
Effects of social exclusion and maternal rejection on Children's high-caloric food consumption.
社会排斥和母性拒绝对儿童高卡路里食物消费的影响。
Appetite. 2020 Feb 1;145:104494. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104494. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
The immutability of valence and arousal in the foundation of emotion.情感基础中价和激活性的不变性。
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):993-1004. doi: 10.1037/emo0000606. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Rise of Adult Obesity: A Time-Trend Analysis of National Examination Data from Germany, 1990-2011.社会经济不平等与成人肥胖的上升:基于德国 1990-2011 年国家考试数据的时间趋势分析。
Obes Facts. 2019;12(3):344-356. doi: 10.1159/000499718. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Feeling bad or feeling good, does emotion affect your consumption of food? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.感觉不好或感觉良好,情绪会影响你的食物消费吗?实验证据的元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:195-208. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 May 31.
7
The Association among Emotions and Food Choices in First-Year College Students Using mobile-Ecological Momentary Assessments.利用移动生态瞬间评估研究大一学生情绪与食物选择之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5447-0.
8
Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m in the United States and England.美国和英国体重指数超过40kg/m²的病态肥胖症中的社会经济不平等现象。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec 28;3:172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.012. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
Personal relative deprivation increases self-selected portion sizes and food intake.个体相对剥夺感会增加自选食物份量和食物摄入量。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.100. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
Social comparison in the brain: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies on the downward and upward comparisons.大脑中的社会比较:基于坐标的关于下行和上行比较的功能性脑成像研究的元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jan;39(1):440-458. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23854. Epub 2017 Oct 24.