Alromaih Saud, Sumaily Ibrahim, Alarifi Ibrahim, Alroqi Ahmad, Aloulah Mohammad, Ajlan Abdulrazag, Yaghmoor Faris, Alsaleh Saad
Rhinology Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
ENT Department, King Fahd Central Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2020 Nov 11;11:2152656720971262. doi: 10.1177/2152656720971262. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
Endoscopic sinus surgery is a common surgery, in which the uncinate process of the ethmoid is removed as the first surgical step. There are multiple techniques for uncinectomy. Herein we describe a new and simple uncinectomy technique.
We performed a randomised controlled trial with blinded assessors. Eight cadaveric heads were used to compare the new technique to the commonly used technique; retrograde uncinectomy. The procedures were performed by 2 rhinologists, and the findings were evaluated by 2 senior rhinologists blinded to the technique and the surgeon who did. They assessed the final view of the procedure and the complications. Thereafter, they assessed the procedure for the duration and ease of each technique for teaching purposes.
Fifteen uncinectomies were performed, 7 using the retrograde technique, and 8 using the new technique. The mean durations were 5.64 min using the seeker uncinectomy and 7.57 min using the retrograde uncinectomy, p-value = 0.017. The completion was better in seeker uncinectomy; however, not significant statistically, p > 0.05. The complications with the new technique were inferior turbinate injury in 12.5% and natural ostium non-identification in 12.5%, p > 0.05. With retrograde uncinectomy, lacrimal injury occurred in 14.3%, p > 0.05. The ease of teaching scores was higher for the seeker uncinectomy.
Based on this cadaveric trial, seeker uncinectomy seems to be a safe and easy to perform technique. However, injury to the inferior turbinate and missing the natural ostium must be taken into consideration. These warrant further studies on the clinical application of this procedure.
鼻内镜鼻窦手术是一种常见手术,其中筛骨钩突切除术是第一步手术操作。钩突切除术有多种技术。在此我们描述一种新的简单钩突切除术技术。
我们进行了一项有盲法评估者的随机对照试验。使用8个尸头将新技术与常用技术——逆行钩突切除术进行比较。手术由2名鼻科医生进行,结果由2名对技术和手术医生不知情的资深鼻科医生评估。他们评估手术的最终视野和并发症。此后,他们出于教学目的评估每种技术的操作时长和难易程度。
共进行了15次钩突切除术,7次采用逆行技术,8次采用新技术。使用探索者钩突切除术的平均时长为5.64分钟,使用逆行钩突切除术的平均时长为7.57分钟,p值 = 0.017。探索者钩突切除术的完成情况更好;然而,在统计学上不显著,p > 0.05。新技术的并发症包括下鼻甲损伤12.5%,自然开口未识别12.5%,p > 0.05。逆行钩突切除术中,泪道损伤发生率为14.3%,p > 0.05。探索者钩突切除术的教学容易度评分更高。
基于这项尸头试验,探索者钩突切除术似乎是一种安全且易于操作的技术。然而,必须考虑下鼻甲损伤和遗漏自然开口的情况。这些情况需要对该手术的临床应用进行进一步研究。