Suppr超能文献

钩突切除术:施坦伯格法还是旋转门技术?

Uncinectomy: Stammberger or swing-door technique?

作者信息

Puranik Vishwanath, El-Sheikha Amir

机构信息

Department of ENT and Head and Neck, Northwest Wales NHS Trust, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, Northwest Wales, UK.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Oct;264(10):1151-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0326-9. Epub 2007 May 22.

Abstract

Uncinectomy is the first step performed in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The technique of performing uncinectomy by various methods depends on training and personal preferences. A postal survey of 585 practising British otorhinolaryngologists has revealed no significant difference in the various techniques of uncinectomies described by Stammberger and the swing-door technique (Wormald). Most surgeons are comfortable with the various techniques of uncinectomy, although the Stammberger technique (45.20%) appears to be easier compared to swing-door (37.34%). The postoperative complications including any comments have been recorded. The aim of this study was to determine which technique of uncinectomy (Stammberger, swing-door) was well advocated by the UK otorhinolaryngologists in FESS.

摘要

筛窦切除术是功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)的第一步。通过各种方法进行筛窦切除术的技术取决于培训情况和个人偏好。对585名英国耳鼻喉科执业医生进行的一项邮政调查显示,施坦伯格描述的各种筛窦切除技术与摇门技术(沃尔默德)之间没有显著差异。大多数外科医生对各种筛窦切除技术都很熟悉,尽管施坦伯格技术(45.20%)似乎比摇门技术(37.34%)更容易。已记录术后并发症及任何相关评论。本研究的目的是确定在FESS中,英国耳鼻喉科医生更推崇哪种筛窦切除技术(施坦伯格技术、摇门技术)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验