Anterolateral versus posterolateral decompression and spinal stabilization in thoracolumbar Potts spine: a comparative study.

AIM

To assess and compare the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of anterolateral and posterolateral decompression and spinal stabilization in the thoracolumbar tuberculous spine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

30 patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis were treated surgically between September 2014 and 2018. Fifteen patients underwent anterolateral decompression and spinal stabilization from September 2014 to September 2016. These patients were studied retrospectively (group A). Fifteen patients underwent posterolateral decompression by costotransversectomy and spinal stabilization from September 2016 to September 2017 were studied prospectively. Neurological recovery, correction of kyphotic deformity, pain (visual analog score) and ESR, and duration of stay were assessed. Neurological outcome was assessed using Frankel grading, and pain was assessed using visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period in both the groups is 12 months. There was a statistically significant difference in the kyphotic angle correction between anterolateral and posterolateral groups at the end of 12 months (follow up). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for ESR, visual analog scale for pain, and neurological recovery (Frankel's grading) at the end of 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Both anterolateral and posterolateral approaches are sufficient thoracic and thoracolumbar tuberculous spine but, the posterolateral approach allows a significant correction of kyphotic angle, better improvement of pain and lesser duration of stay.