Suppr超能文献

八旬和九旬患者行经静脉心脏起搏器和除颤器导线拔除术的风险因素和长期生存。

Risk Factors and Long-Term Survival of Octogenarians and Nonagenarians Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures.

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Collegium Medicum of Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland,

出版信息

Gerontology. 2021;67(1):36-48. doi: 10.1159/000511358. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has become a frequently used tool for the management of complications related to pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. However, it is still a matter of debate whether the lead extraction procedure is a safe treatment choice in the elderly.

METHODS

We collected the clinical information from 3,810 patients undergoing TLE in 2 high-volume centers (Poland and Italy) between 2006 and 2017. We tested risk factors, effectiveness, safety and long-term survival in 3 groups of patients: those aged 80-89.99 years, ≥90 years and 30-79.99 years.

RESULTS

Lower BMI, lower levels of hemoglobin and more comorbidities characterized the patients, whose ages ranged from 80 to 89.99 years. Those aged ≥90 years most often had single-chamber pacemakers. Octogenarians and nonagenarians were more often undergoing TLE due to infectious indications (57.19 and 74.29 vs. 45.35% in younger individuals). Lead age and the number of leads extracted were comparable in the 3 groups. In octogenarians, leads were more often removed using standard extraction techniques: simple traction and mechanical dilatators, whereas in nonagenarians TLE was more complex. The duration of the procedure was shorter in older patients, while clinical and procedural effectiveness was similar to that in younger individuals. The rate of major complications related to TLE did not differ between octogenarians and younger subjects (2.0 vs. 1.38%, p = ns), and the number of procedure-related risk factors was smaller in older people. Nonagenarians did not develop any major complication related to TLE. Long-term mortality after TLE was similar among octogenarians and nonagenarians (39.67 and 40.00%) but higher than in younger patients (24.41; p < 0.001 and 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lead extraction procedures appear effective and safe in octogenarians and nonagenarians, comparable to younger individuals. Procedure-related risk in the elderly is not associated with most of the typical risk factors encountered in younger subjects, but only with the higher number of pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy device procedures before TLE. Long-term survival after TLE was found to be similar among octogenarians and nonagenarians being about 60% at over 3 years of follow-up. Age alone should not be considered a risk factor for the occurrence of major complications or procedure-related death, and therefore it should not prevent candidacy for TLE.

摘要

简介

经静脉心脏起搏器、植入式心脏除颤器和心脏再同步治疗设备相关并发症的管理中,经静脉心脏导线拔除术(TLE)已成为一种常用的治疗手段。然而,导线拔除术对于老年人是否是一种安全的治疗选择仍然存在争议。

方法

我们收集了 2006 年至 2017 年间,在 2 个高容量中心(波兰和意大利)接受 TLE 的 3810 例患者的临床资料。我们在 3 组患者中测试了风险因素、有效性、安全性和长期生存率:年龄 80-89.99 岁、≥90 岁和 30-79.99 岁。

结果

年龄在 80 至 89.99 岁的患者中,BMI 较低、血红蛋白水平较低且合并症较多。年龄≥90 岁的患者多为单腔起搏器。80 岁和 90 岁以上的患者因感染而接受 TLE 的比例更高(57.19%和 74.29%比年轻患者的 45.35%)。3 组患者的导线使用年限和拔除的导线数量相似。在 80 岁以上的患者中,导线更常使用标准拔除技术:简单牵引和机械扩张器,而在 90 岁以上的患者中,TLE 更为复杂。老年患者的手术时间较短,而临床和手术效果与年轻患者相似。TLE 相关的主要并发症发生率在 80 岁以上的患者和年轻患者之间没有差异(2.0%比 1.38%,p = ns),并且老年人的手术相关风险因素较少。90 岁以上的患者没有发生与 TLE 相关的任何主要并发症。TLE 后长期死亡率在 80 岁以上的患者和 90 岁以上的患者之间相似(39.67%和 40.00%),但高于年轻患者(24.41%;p < 0.001 和 0.05)。

结论

TLE 在 80 岁以上和 90 岁以上的患者中均有效且安全,与年轻患者相似。在老年人中,与手术相关的风险与年轻患者中遇到的大多数典型风险因素无关,而仅与 TLE 前更多的起搏器、植入式心脏除颤器和心脏再同步治疗设备的数量有关。TLE 后 3 年以上的随访发现,80 岁以上和 90 岁以上的患者的长期生存率相似,约为 60%。年龄本身不应被视为发生重大并发症或与手术相关死亡的危险因素,因此不应阻止 TLE 的候选资格。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验