Roelofs Charlotte L, Krepel Noralie, Corlier Juliana, Carpenter Linda L, Fitzgerald Paul B, Daskalakis Zafiris J, Tendolkar Indira, Wilson Andrew, Downar Jonathan, Bailey Neil W, Blumberger Daniel M, Vila-Rodriguez Fidel, Leuchter Andrew F, Arns Martijn
Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Feb;132(2):643-649. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
The aim of the current study was to attempt to replicate the finding that the individual alpha frequency (IAF) as well as the absolute difference between IAF and 10 Hz stimulation frequency (IAF-prox) is related to treatment outcome.
Correlations were performed to investigate the relationship between IAF-prox and percentage symptom improvement in a sample of 153 patients with major depressive disorder treated with 10 Hz (N = 59) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or 1 Hz (N = 94) to the right DLPFC repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS).
There was a significant negative correlation between IAF-prox and the percentage of symptom improvement only for the 10 Hz group. Curve fitting models revealed that there was a quadratic association between IAF and treatment response in the 10 Hz group, with a peak at 10 Hz IAF.
The main result of Corlier and colleagues was replicated, and the findings suggest that the distance between 10 Hz stimulation frequency and the IAF may influence clinical outcome in a non-linear manner.
rTMS is often administered at a frequency of 10 Hz, which is the center of the EEG alpha frequency band. The results can make a significant contribution to optimizing the clinical application of rTMS.
本研究旨在尝试重复一项发现,即个体阿尔法频率(IAF)以及IAF与10赫兹刺激频率之间的绝对差值(IAF-prox)与治疗结果相关。
对153例接受10赫兹(N = 59)左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)或1赫兹(N = 94)右侧DLPFC重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗的重度抑郁症患者样本,进行相关性分析以研究IAF-prox与症状改善百分比之间的关系。
仅在10赫兹组中,IAF-prox与症状改善百分比之间存在显著负相关。曲线拟合模型显示,10赫兹组中IAF与治疗反应之间存在二次关联,在IAF为10赫兹时达到峰值。
重复了科利尔及其同事的主要研究结果,研究结果表明10赫兹刺激频率与IAF之间的距离可能以非线性方式影响临床结果。
rTMS通常以10赫兹的频率施用,该频率是脑电图阿尔法频段的中心。这些结果可为优化rTMS的临床应用做出重大贡献。