Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Defence Healthcare Organisation, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):e73-e84. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
This study evaluates the effect of nonexercise interventions on the reduction of risk for musculoskeletal injuries in armed forces.
A database search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, Greylit, Open Grey, the WHO trial registry, and the reference lists of included articles up to July 2019. RCTs and cluster RCTs evaluating nonexercise interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries in armed forces compared with any other intervention(s) or no intervention were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done by 2 authors independently, followed by meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment, if appropriate.
This study included 27 articles with a total number of 25,593 participants, examining nutritional supplementation, prophylactic medication, and equipment modifications with mostly high or unclear risk of bias. Meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment could be performed for 3 comparisons: custom-made insoles versus no insoles, tropical/hot-weather boots versus leather boots, and shock-absorbing insoles versus nonshock-absorbing insoles interventions, all showing the very low quality of evidence. Some evidence was found to support the preventive effect of shock-absorbing insoles, basketball shoes, padded polyester socks, calcium with vitamin D supplementation, only calcium supplementation, protein supplementation, and dynamic patellofemoral braces.
Although an evidence base for the efficacy of preventive interventions for musculoskeletal injuries in armed forces is weak, there are some indications for the preventive effect of shock-absorbing insoles, basketball shoes, padded polyester socks, supplementation of calcium alone or combined with vitamin D, protein supplementation, and dynamic patellofemoral braces on the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries.
本研究评估了非运动干预措施对减少武装部队肌肉骨骼损伤风险的影响。
在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL、SPORTdiscus、Greylit、Open Grey、世界卫生组织临床试验注册中心和纳入文章的参考文献中进行了数据库搜索,截至 2019 年 7 月。符合纳入标准的 RCT 和簇 RCT 评估了非运动干预措施在预防武装部队肌肉骨骼损伤方面与任何其他干预措施或无干预措施的比较。数据提取和偏倚风险评估由 2 名作者独立进行,如果合适,进行荟萃分析和推荐评估、制定和评估分级评估。
本研究纳入了 27 篇文章,共有 25593 名参与者,研究内容包括营养补充、预防性药物和设备修改,这些研究大多存在高或不清楚的偏倚风险。荟萃分析和推荐评估、制定和评估分级评估可用于 3 种比较:定制鞋垫与无鞋垫、热带/热天靴与皮靴、减震鞋垫与非减震鞋垫干预,所有这些比较均显示出极低质量的证据。有一些证据支持减震鞋垫、篮球鞋、加垫聚酯袜子、钙加维生素 D 补充剂、仅钙补充剂、蛋白质补充剂和动态髌股关节支具对预防肌肉骨骼损伤的作用。
尽管预防武装部队肌肉骨骼损伤的干预措施的疗效证据基础薄弱,但有一些迹象表明减震鞋垫、篮球鞋、加垫聚酯袜子、单独或联合补充钙和维生素 D、蛋白质补充剂和动态髌股关节支具对肌肉骨骼损伤的发生率有预防作用。