Pennsylvania Hospital OBGYN, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):40-44. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001934. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
A retrospective cohort study comparing survival and perioperative outcomes of patients with early vulvar cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy versus standard lymphadenectomy METHODS: Patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2015 with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma of less than 4 cm in size, with invasion of at least 1 mm, who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymphadenectomy, or both were identified from the National Cancer Database. Overall survival was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test for patients who had at least 1 month of follow-up. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.
A total of 1583 patients were identified; 304 patients (19.2%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy utilization increased 13.9% between 2012 and 2015. Patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy alone were less likely to have comorbidities compared with those undergoing lymphadenectomy only or sentinel node biopsy with lymphadenectomy (25.3% vs 32.9% vs 31.9%, p=0.042), had smaller tumors (median 1.6 vs 2.0 vs 2.0 cm, p<0.001), and were less likely to have positive lymph nodes (11% vs 19.6% vs 28.1%, p<0.001). There was no difference in 3 year overall survival between the three groups (86.3% vs 82.1% vs 77.9%, p=0.26). After controlling for age, race, insurance, comorbidities, lymph node metastases, and tumor size, sentinel lymph node biopsy alone was not associated with worse overall survival compared with lymphadenectomy (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.32). The sentinel node only group had shorter inpatient stays compared with lymphadenectomy only (median 1 vs 2 days, p<0.001) and a lower rate of unplanned readmission (1.7% vs 5.0%, p=0.010).
The utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy is increasing in the management of vulvar cancer and is associated with superior perioperative outcomes without impacting overall survival.
一项回顾性队列研究比较了接受前哨淋巴结活检与标准淋巴结清扫术的早期外阴癌患者的生存和围手术期结局。
从国家癌症数据库中确定了 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间诊断为侵袭性小于 1 毫米且直径小于 4 厘米的外阴鳞癌患者,这些患者接受了前哨淋巴结活检、淋巴结清扫或两者的治疗。通过生成 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估总生存率,并对至少有 1 个月随访的患者进行对数秩检验。构建 Cox 模型以控制混杂因素。
共纳入 1583 例患者,其中 304 例(19.2%)患者仅接受前哨淋巴结活检。2012 年至 2015 年间,单独进行前哨淋巴结活检的患者比例增加了 13.9%。与仅行淋巴结清扫或前哨淋巴结活检联合淋巴结清扫的患者相比,仅行前哨淋巴结活检的患者合并症更少(25.3%比 32.9%比 31.9%,p=0.042),肿瘤更小(中位数 1.6cm 比 2.0cm 比 2.0cm,p<0.001),且淋巴结阳性的可能性更小(11%比 19.6%比 28.1%,p<0.001)。三组患者 3 年总生存率无差异(86.3%比 82.1%比 77.9%,p=0.26)。在校正年龄、种族、保险、合并症、淋巴结转移和肿瘤大小后,与淋巴结清扫相比,仅行前哨淋巴结活检与总生存率较差无关(HR 0.86,95%CI 0.57 至 1.32)。与仅行淋巴结清扫相比,仅行前哨淋巴结活检的患者住院时间更短(中位数 1 天比 2 天,p<0.001),计划外再入院率更低(1.7%比 5.0%,p=0.010)。
前哨淋巴结活检在外阴癌的治疗中应用日益广泛,可改善围手术期结局,而不影响总生存率。