Gustavo Duarte Pimentel, Faculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Goiás. Rua 227, Quadra 68 s/n°, Setor Leste Universitário, CEP 74605080. Goiânia, GO. Brasil. Email:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(10):1128-1130. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1524-z.
Strength, Assistance for walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) score is frequently used for screening the sarcopenia risk in older people. However, the agreement between SARC-F and loss of ultrasound-derived muscle thickness in hospitalized older cancer patients is unexplored.
The primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between the SARC-F score and ultrasound-derived muscle thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius in older hospitalised cancer patients. The secondary objective was to identify the presence of sarcopenia.
A cross-sectional study enrolled forty-one older hospitalised cancer patients ongoing chemotherapy or surgical treatment. Body weight (kg) was measured using a digital scale and height using a portable stadiometer to assess body mass index. SARC-F was performed to assess and classify sarcopenia risk (with (SARC-F: ≥4), without (SARC-F: <4). US-derived muscle thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius was assessed using a portable ultrasound. Relationship between the SARC-F and muscle thickness was tested using Pearson´s correlation and Bland-Altman analyses.
Approximately, 46.3% of the patients presented sarcopenia and a lower non-significant muscle thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius (SARC-F ≥4: 18.54±6.28 vs. SARC-F <4: 22.22±9.16 mm, p=0.07). There was a moderate negative correlation between SARC-F and muscle thickness (r=-0.40, p=0.004). Additionally, Bland-Altman plots no found systematic bias risk between SARC-F and ultrasound-derived muscle thickness.
Approximately, 46.3% of older hospitalized cancer patients presented sarcopenia. Additionally, we found a moderate inverse correlation and no systematic bias risk between SARC-F and ultrasound-measured muscle thickness.
力量、助行能力、从椅子上站起来、爬楼梯和跌倒(SARC-F)评分常用于筛查老年人的肌肉减少症风险。然而,SARC-F 评分与住院老年癌症患者超声测量的肌肉厚度损失之间的一致性尚未得到探索。
主要目的是评估 SARC-F 评分与住院老年癌症患者股直肌和股中间肌超声测量肌肉厚度之间的关系。次要目的是确定是否存在肌肉减少症。
一项横断面研究纳入了 41 名正在接受化疗或手术治疗的老年住院癌症患者。使用数字秤测量体重(kg),使用便携式测高仪测量身高,以评估体重指数。进行 SARC-F 以评估和分类肌肉减少症风险(有(SARC-F:≥4),无(SARC-F:<4)。使用便携式超声评估股直肌和股中间肌的超声测量肌肉厚度。使用 Pearson 相关和 Bland-Altman 分析测试 SARC-F 与肌肉厚度之间的关系。
大约 46.3%的患者存在肌肉减少症,股直肌和股中间肌的非显著厚度较低(SARC-F≥4:18.54±6.28 vs. SARC-F<4:22.22±9.16 mm,p=0.07)。SARC-F 与肌肉厚度之间存在中度负相关(r=-0.40,p=0.004)。此外,Bland-Altman 图未发现 SARC-F 和超声测量的肌肉厚度之间存在系统偏差风险。
大约 46.3%的住院老年癌症患者存在肌肉减少症。此外,我们发现 SARC-F 与超声测量的肌肉厚度之间存在中度负相关,且无系统偏差风险。