• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

螺钉固位和粘结剂固位的氧化锆全瓷冠的机械行为和 fracture load。

Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Loads of Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Crowns.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, University Center of Espírito Santo-UNESC, Colatina, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, Ingá University Center- UNINGÁ and Maringá State University, Maringá, Brazil.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;30(8):690-697. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13298. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.13298
PMID:33245170
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fatigue survival, fracture loads and failure modes of monolithic lithium disilicate screw-retained crowns, attached to titanium insert, and cement-retained crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Internal tapered connection implants, embedded in acrylic resin at 30° inclination, were restored with lithium disilicate restorations, simulating a maxillary premolar (n = 20), with different designs: screw-retained titanium base abutment-crowns, and cement-retained crowns. The specimens were submitted to cyclic mechanical loading (1.2 × 10 cycles with a load of 0-250 N at 2 Hz). Surviving specimens were subjected to single load to fracture in a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined with the aid of an optical microscope. Maximum load values were analyzed statistically using the t-test and differences in failure modes were analyzed using the chi-squared test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

All specimens survived the cyclic mechanical loading. Fracture load was significantly higher for screw-retained crowns (821.69 ±196.71 N) than the cement-retained crowns (577.03 ± 137.75 N) (p = 0.005). Ceramic failure was the predominant mode, with no statistical difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Screw-retained and cement-retained lithium disilicate crowns survived the cyclic mechanical loading. The use of titanium inserts to support a monolithic restoration enhances the fracture strength of the crown/abutment system.

摘要

目的

评估整体式二硅酸锂螺丝固位冠和粘结固位冠的疲劳寿命、骨折载荷和失效模式,这些修复体附着在钛嵌体上。

材料与方法

将内部锥形连接种植体以 30°的倾斜角度嵌入丙烯酸树脂中,用二硅酸锂修复体模拟上颌前磨牙(n=20)进行修复,设计有两种:螺丝固位钛基底基台-冠和粘结固位冠。将样本进行循环机械加载(2 Hz 时 0-250 N 负载 1.2×10 次循环)。存活的样本在万能试验机上进行单次断裂载荷测试,并借助光学显微镜确定失效模式。使用 t 检验对最大载荷值进行统计学分析,使用卡方检验分析失效模式的差异(α=0.05)。

结果

所有样本均通过了循环机械加载测试。螺丝固位冠的断裂载荷(821.69±196.71 N)明显高于粘结固位冠(577.03±137.75 N)(p=0.005)。陶瓷失效是主要模式,两组之间无统计学差异。

结论

螺丝固位和粘结固位的二硅酸锂冠均通过了循环机械加载测试。使用钛嵌体来支撑整体修复体可提高冠/基台系统的断裂强度。

相似文献

1
Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Loads of Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Crowns.螺钉固位和粘结剂固位的氧化锆全瓷冠的机械行为和 fracture load。
J Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;30(8):690-697. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13298. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.疲劳后整体式二硅酸锂植入物支持的单冠与钛基基台粘结与定制陶瓷基台粘结的失败负荷。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):136-146. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13369. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.水泥和螺钉固位氧化锆锂硅玻璃陶瓷冠的机械完整性与莫氏锥度种植体的结合。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):721-731. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.两种制作技术和两种设计的定制硅酸锂植入修复体的抗 fracture 性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):677-684. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9657.
5
Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.种植体上水泥和螺钉固位全瓷单冠的机械性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):981-991. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2178-z. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
6
Evaluation of the masking ability, marginal adaptation, and fracture resistance of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to titanium bases versus preparable abutments.评估螺丝固位的硅酸锂基全瓷冠修复体黏接到钛基底和可预备基台上时的边缘适合性、密合度和抗折裂性能。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03281-8.
7
Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns.各种基于钛的、CAD-CAM 和 PFM 种植体冠的断裂强度。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Apr;33(3):522-530. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12672. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.钛锆及氧化锆种植体的抗折性能
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jun;31(5):441-446. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13440. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
9
Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.不同陶瓷种植体基台的疲劳载荷及失效模式的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun;127(6):875-881. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.059. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.单单位种植体支持式冠的抗折性:修复体设计和修复材料的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;31(4):348-355. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13415. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Monolithic Hybrid Abutment Crowns (Screw-Retained) Versus Monolithic Hybrid Abutments With Monolithic Crowns (Adhesively Cemented): Three-Year Data of a Prospective Clinical Split-Mouth Study.整体式混合基台冠(螺丝固位)与带整体式冠的整体式混合基台(粘结固定):一项前瞻性临床双侧对照研究的三年数据
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):126-141. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13335. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
2
[Compressive stress in three types of finishing lines with lithium disilicate crowns in permanent teeth: finite element analysis].[恒牙中三种不同边缘设计的二硅酸锂全冠的压应力:有限元分析]
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024 Mar 30;12(1):e182. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1201-2024-182. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
3
A Systematic Review of Cementation Techniques to Minimize Cement Excess in Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
关于减少水泥固定种植体修复中水泥过量的黏固技术的系统评价
Methods Protoc. 2022 Jan 17;5(1):9. doi: 10.3390/mps5010009.