Kober G, Hopf R, Biamino G, Bubenheimer P, Förster K, Kuck K H, Hanrath P, von Olshausen K E, Schlepper M, Kaltenbach M
Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt.
Z Kardiol. 1987;76 Suppl 3:113-8.
The effects of a 2-year treatment with high-dose propranolol (mean, 340 +/- 135 mg/day) and verapamil (mean, 493 +/- 136 mg/day) were compared in two groups of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Both groups were broadly identical at the beginning of the trial and were formed of matched pairs. Out of 137 patients entering the study, 37 pairs completed the 2 year follow-up. The mean group symptomatology (NYHA-classification) improved significantly only following verapamil treatment. Individual improvement was seen more often following verapamil (V), but deterioration was almost exclusively seen during propranolol (P) treatment. Reduction of the Sokolow-index was significant in the V group only. Reduction in the resting heart rate and maximum gradient was more pronounced following P. No correlation could be found between the change in clinical symptoms and electrocardiographic, echocardiographic or hemodynamic data, nor to the dosage of V or P administered. From clinical and echocardiographic findings and in respect of side effects, V is advantageous over P in the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, although a considerable number of patients improve after P. Objective data do not allow one to anticipate responders or non-responders to either treatment.
在两组肥厚型心肌病患者中比较了高剂量普萘洛尔(平均340±135毫克/天)和维拉帕米(平均493±136毫克/天)进行2年治疗的效果。两组在试验开始时大致相同,由配对组成。在137名进入研究的患者中,37对完成了2年随访。仅在维拉帕米治疗后,平均组症状(纽约心脏协会分级)有显著改善。维拉帕米(V)治疗后个体改善更常见,但恶化几乎仅见于普萘洛尔(P)治疗期间。仅在V组中,索科洛夫指数降低显著。静息心率和最大压力阶差的降低在P治疗后更明显。临床症状变化与心电图、超声心动图或血流动力学数据之间,以及与所给予的V或P剂量之间均未发现相关性。从临床和超声心动图结果以及副作用方面来看,在肥厚型心肌病的治疗中,V比P更具优势,尽管相当数量的患者在P治疗后有所改善。客观数据无法让人预测对任何一种治疗的反应者或无反应者。