Suppr超能文献

14 岁以上还是以下?一项基于下颌前磨牙和第二磨牙萌出的时间进程的南印度儿童的口腔全景片研究。

Above or below 14 years? An orthopantomographic study based on chronological course of eruption of mandibular premolars and second molars in a sample of south Indian children.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, AIMST University, Malaysia.

Department of Forensic Odontology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021 Feb;48:101814. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101814. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

Abstract

In the context of dental age assessment, two significant factors can be studied; tooth mineralisation and tooth emergence. Little is known about the role of a second molar eruption in forensic age estimation. This paper aims to contribute to forensic age estimation using an age threshold of 14 years, studying the eruption stages of permanent mandibular premolars and second molars. Totally 640 orthopantomograms (OPGs) of south Indian children, aged between 10 and 18 years, were evaluated using Olze et al. staging of tooth eruption stages (A-D). Spearman's rho correlation showed a strong, positive, and statistically significant correlation between the chronological age and the eruption stages of both sexes' teeth. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probability values were calculated for all tested teeth. The best performance to discriminate individuals above or below 14 years showed stage D in second molars. The sensitivity varied between 89% and 94% and specificity between 75% and 84%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed high diagnostic performance for stage D, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 84% and 85% for tooth 37 and 85% and 83% for tooth 47 in males and females, respectively. In conclusion, it is possible to predict age over 14 years in south Indian children using tooth emergence stages from OPGs with a relatively high interobserver agreement and good diagnostic accuracy. However, there are some limitations and, therefore, must be used in conjunction with other methods.

摘要

在牙龄评估的背景下,可以研究两个重要因素:牙齿矿化和牙齿萌出。对于第二磨牙萌出在法医年龄估计中的作用知之甚少。本文旨在通过使用 14 岁的年龄阈值,研究下颌恒前磨牙和第二磨牙的萌出阶段,为法医年龄估计做出贡献。总共评估了 640 名年龄在 10 至 18 岁之间的南印度儿童的全景片(OPG),使用 Olze 等人的牙齿萌出阶段分期(A-D)进行评估。Spearman 等级相关分析显示,男女牙齿的萌出阶段与实际年龄之间存在强正相关,且具有统计学意义。计算了所有测试牙齿的准确性、敏感性、特异性、似然比和后验概率值。第二磨牙萌出阶段 D 区分 14 岁以上和以下个体的性能最佳。敏感性在 89%至 94%之间,特异性在 75%至 84%之间。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,第二磨牙萌出阶段 D 的诊断性能较高,男性和女性的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为 84%和 85%,牙 37 和 85%和 83%,牙 47。总之,使用 OPG 中牙齿萌出阶段可以预测南印度儿童 14 岁以上的年龄,具有较高的观察者间一致性和良好的诊断准确性。然而,存在一些限制,因此必须与其他方法结合使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验