• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在危重症成年患者中,比较使用最小压力与最大压力超声评估肌肉量与计算机断层扫描的效果。

Assessment of muscle mass using ultrasound with minimal versus maximal pressure compared with computed tomography in critically ill adult patients.

作者信息

Fetterplace Kate, Corlette Lucy, Abdelhamid Yasmine Ali, Presneill Jeffrey J, Paris Michael T, Stella Damien, Mourtzakis Marina, MacIsaac Christopher, Deane Adam M

机构信息

Department of Allied Health (Clinical Nutrition), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Crit Care. 2021 Jul;34(4):303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2020.10.008
PMID:33246863
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preserved skeletal muscle mass identified using computed tomography (CT) predicts improved outcomes from critical illness; however, CT imaging have few limitations such that it involves a radiation dose and transferring patients out of the intensive care unit. This study aimed to assess in critically ill patients the relationship between muscle mass estimates obtained using minimally invasive ultrasound techniques with both minimal and maximal pressure compared with CT images at the third lumber vertebra level.

METHODS

All patients were treated in a single Australian intensive care unit. Eligible patients had paired assessments, within a 72-h window, of muscle mass by ultrasound (quadriceps muscle layer thickness in centimetres, with maximal and minimal pressure) and CT axial cross-sectional area (cm). Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), and frequencies [n (%)].

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients [mean (standard deviation) age = 55 (16) years, median (interquartile range) body mass index = 27 (25-32) kg/m, and 26 (74%) men] contributed 41 paired measurements. Quadriceps muscle thickness measured using the maximal pressure technique was a strong independent predictor of lumbar muscle cross-sectional area. Within a multivariate mixed linear regression model and adjusting for sex, age, and body mass index, for every 1 cm increase in quadriceps muscle layer thickness, the lumbar muscle cross-sectional area increased by 35 cm (95% confidence interval = 11-59 cm). Similar univariate associations were observed using minimal pressure; however, as per multivariate analysis, there was no strength in this relationship [8 cm (95% confidence interval = -5 to 22 cm)].

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound assessment of the quadriceps muscle using maximal pressure reasonably predicts the skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra level of critically ill patients. However, there is substantial uncertainty within these regression estimates, and this may reduce the current utility of this technique as a minimally invasive surrogate for CT assessment of skeletal muscle mass.

摘要

背景

使用计算机断层扫描(CT)识别出的保留骨骼肌质量可预测危重症患者的预后改善;然而,CT成像存在一些局限性,包括辐射剂量以及需要将患者转出重症监护病房。本研究旨在评估在危重症患者中,使用微创超声技术在最小和最大压力下获得的肌肉质量估计值与第三腰椎水平CT图像之间的关系。

方法

所有患者均在澳大利亚的一个重症监护病房接受治疗。符合条件的患者在72小时内通过超声(股四头肌层厚度,以厘米为单位,测量最大和最小压力)和CT轴向截面积(平方厘米)进行肌肉质量的配对评估。数据以均值(标准差)、中位数(四分位间距)和频率[n(%)]表示。

结果

35例患者[平均(标准差)年龄=55(16)岁,中位数(四分位间距)体重指数=27(25-32)kg/m²,26例(74%)为男性]提供了41对测量数据。使用最大压力技术测量的股四头肌厚度是腰椎肌肉截面积的强有力独立预测指标。在多变量混合线性回归模型中,并对性别、年龄和体重指数进行调整后,股四头肌层厚度每增加1厘米,腰椎肌肉截面积增加35平方厘米(95%置信区间=11-59平方厘米)。使用最小压力时观察到类似的单变量关联;然而,根据多变量分析,这种关系没有统计学意义[8平方厘米(95%置信区间=-5至22平方厘米)]。

结论

使用最大压力对股四头肌进行超声评估可合理预测危重症患者第三腰椎水平的骨骼肌情况。然而,这些回归估计存在很大不确定性,这可能会降低该技术作为CT评估骨骼肌质量的微创替代方法的当前实用性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of muscle mass using ultrasound with minimal versus maximal pressure compared with computed tomography in critically ill adult patients.在危重症成年患者中,比较使用最小压力与最大压力超声评估肌肉量与计算机断层扫描的效果。
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Jul;34(4):303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Validation of Bedside Ultrasound of Muscle Layer Thickness of the Quadriceps in the Critically Ill Patient (VALIDUM Study).危重症患者股四头肌肌肉层厚度床边超声检查的验证(VALIDUM研究)
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Feb;41(2):171-180. doi: 10.1177/0148607116637852. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
Comparison between ultrasonography and computed tomography for measuring skeletal muscle mass in critically ill patients with different body mass index.超声与 CT 测量不同 BMI 危重症患者骨骼肌量的比较。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024 Feb;59:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.12.012. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
Validation by CT scan of quadriceps muscle thickness measurement by ultrasound in acute kidney injury.CT 扫描验证超声测量急性肾损伤患者股四头肌厚度。
J Nephrol. 2020 Feb;33(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s40620-019-00659-2. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
Reliability of standardized ultrasound measurements of quadriceps muscle thickness in neurological critically ill patients: a comparison to computed tomography measures.神经危重症患者股四头肌厚度的标准化超声测量的可靠性:与计算机断层扫描测量的比较。
J Rehabil Med. 2020 Mar 18;52(3):jrm00032. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2638.
6
Association between ultrasound quadriceps muscle status with premorbid functional status and 60-day mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patient: A single-center prospective observational study.超声股四头肌状态与机械通气危重症患者发病前功能状态和 60 天死亡率的关系:一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):1338-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
Ultrasound assessment of muscle mass has potential to identify patients with low muscularity at intensive care unit admission: A retrospective study.超声评估肌肉量有可能在重症监护病房入院时识别出肌肉量低的患者:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Oct;45:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
Validation of bedside ultrasound to predict lumbar muscle area in the computed tomography in 200 non-critically ill patients: The USVALID prospective study.200 例非危重症患者 CT 腰椎肌肉面积的床旁超声预测验证:前瞻性 USVALID 研究。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Apr;41(4):829-837. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.034. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Peripheral muscular ultrasound as outcome assessment tool in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation: An observational cohort study.外周肌超声作为机械通气危重症患者结局评估工具的观察性队列研究。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Jun;43:408-414. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
Comparison of Ultrasound-Derived Muscle Thickness With Computed Tomography Muscle Cross-Sectional Area on Admission to the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.超声测量肌肉厚度与重症监护病房入院时 CT 肌肉截面积的比较:一项初步的横断面研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Jan;45(1):136-145. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1822. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a reliable and convenient methodology for ultrasound muscle assessment in critically ill patients: A reliability study.为危重症患者开发一种可靠且便捷的超声肌肉评估方法:一项可靠性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 25;104(17):e42263. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042263.
2
Exploring Peripheral and Respiratory Muscle Weakness and Functional Impairments in ICU Patients: Insights From a Resource-Constrained Setting.探索重症监护病房患者的外周和呼吸肌无力及功能障碍:来自资源有限环境的见解。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1245. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001245. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
3
Methodologies and clinical applications of lower limb muscle ultrasound in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
危重症患者下肢肌肉超声的方法学及临床应用:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01395-y.
4
Clinical practice guidelines for nutritional assessment and monitoring of adult ICU patients in China.《中国成人重症监护病房患者营养评估与监测临床实践指南》
J Intensive Med. 2024 Feb 2;4(2):137-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.12.002. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation and functional outcomes in multi-trauma patients: a study protocol for a pilot randomised clinical trial (BOOST trial).β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸(HMB)补充剂与多发伤患者的功能结局:一项试点随机临床试验的研究方案(BOOST试验)
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 31;8(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00990-9.