Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):62-69. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3555. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
Molecular imaging with novel radiotracers is changing the treatment landscape in prostate cancer (PCa). Currently, standard of care includes either conventional and molecular imaging at time of biochemical recurrence (BCR). This study evaluated the determinants of and cost associated with utilization of molecular imaging for BCR PCa.
This is a retrospective observational cohort study among men with BCR PCa from June 2018 to May 2019. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to analyze the primary outcome: receipt of molecular imaging (e.g. Fluciclovine PET and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET) as part of diagnostic work-up for BCR PCa. Multivariate linear regression models were used to analyze the secondary outcome: overall healthcare cost within a 1-year time frame.
The study sample included 234 patients; 79.1% White, 2.1% Black, 8.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 10.3% Other. The majority were 55 years or older (97.9%) and publicly insured (74.8%). Analysis indicated a one-unit reduction in PSA is associated with 1.3 times higher likelihood of receiving molecular imaging (p < 0.01). Analysis found that privately insured patients were associated with approximately $500,000 more in hospital reimbursement (p < 0.01) as compared to the publicly insured. Additionally, a one-unit increase in PSA is associated with $6254 increase in hospital reimbursement or an increase in total payments by 2.1% (p < 0.05).
Higher PSA was associated with lower likelihood for molecular imaging and higher cost in a one-year time frame. Higher cost was also associated with private insurance, but there was no clear relationship between insurance type and imaging type.
新型放射性示踪剂的分子成像正在改变前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗格局。目前,标准治疗包括在生化复发(BCR)时进行常规和分子成像。本研究评估了 BCR PCa 中使用分子成像的决定因素及其相关成本。
这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 5 月期间患有 BCR PCa 的男性。采用多变量逻辑回归模型分析主要结局:是否接受分子成像(例如 Fluciclovine PET 和前列腺特异性膜抗原 PET)作为 BCR PCa 诊断工作的一部分。采用多变量线性回归模型分析次要结局:1 年内的总医疗保健成本。
研究样本包括 234 名患者;79.1%为白人,2.1%为黑人,8.5%为亚洲/太平洋岛民,10.3%为其他。大多数患者年龄在 55 岁或以上(97.9%),且有公共保险(74.8%)。分析表明,PSA 每降低一个单位,接受分子成像的可能性就会增加 1.3 倍(p<0.01)。分析发现,与公共保险相比,私人保险患者的医院报销费用约增加 50 万美元(p<0.01)。此外,PSA 每增加一个单位,医院报销费用增加 6254 美元,或总支付额增加 2.1%(p<0.05)。
在 1 年内,较高的 PSA 与较低的分子成像可能性和较高的成本相关。较高的成本也与私人保险有关,但保险类型和成像类型之间没有明显的关系。