Suppr超能文献

我想回家:我们是否应该放弃开放性手术治疗直肠脱垂?直肠脱垂手术后出院去向的考虑。

I want to go home: should we abandon open surgery for treatment of rectal prolapse? Consideration of discharge destination following surgery for rectal prolapse.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Rush Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2021 Apr;23(4):955-966. doi: 10.1111/codi.15466. Epub 2021 Jan 10.

Abstract

AIM

Despite the financial and value-based implications associated with higher levels of care at discharge, few studies have evaluated modifiable treatment factors that may optimize postacute care. The aim of this work was to assess the association between operative approach and disposition to a higher level of care and other outcomes following surgery for rectal prolapse.

METHOD

Using a retrospective cohort study design, the database of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients with rectal prolapse who underwent perineal repair or open or laparoscopic rectopexy with or without resection between 2012 and 2017. Discharge destination and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared using propensity score mathcing and weighting. Nomograms generated using multivariable regression calculated the risk of requiring higher levels of care upon discharge and morbidity.

RESULTS

Propensity-score analysis included 3000 patients [1500 in the perineal group, 580 in the open abdominal group and 920 in the minimally invasive (MIS) group]. Patients who received open abdominal surgery were more likely to require elevation of care at destination compared with those who received perineal surgery (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22-1.24) and MIS abdominal surgery (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.18-2.76). Similar effects were seen for overall morbidity. Increased age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, congestive heart failure, dependent functional status and open surgery were independent predictors of discharge to higher level of care (c-statistic = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

Open surgery compared with MIS and perineal surgery was associated with higher levels of discharge disposition following rectal prolapse surgery. Future research should continue to identify modifiable treatment factors that reduce poor postoperative outcomes among patients with rectal prolapse.

摘要

目的

尽管出院时更高水平的护理与经济和价值有关,但很少有研究评估可能优化急性后护理的可修改治疗因素。本研究旨在评估直肠脱垂手术中手术方法与更高水平护理的处置以及其他术后结果之间的关系。

方法

使用回顾性队列研究设计,使用国家手术质量改进计划数据库,确定 2012 年至 2017 年间接受经会阴修补术或开放性或腹腔镜直肠固定术加或不加切除术治疗的直肠脱垂患者。使用倾向评分匹配和加权比较出院目的地和 30 天术后结果。使用多变量回归生成的列线图计算出院时需要更高水平护理的风险和发病率。

结果

倾向评分分析包括 3000 名患者[会阴组 1500 名,开放性腹部组 580 名,微创(MIS)组 920 名]。接受开放性腹部手术的患者与接受会阴手术的患者(OR 1.65,95%CI 1.22-1.24)和 MIS 腹部手术(OR 1.80,95%CI 1.18-2.76)相比,更有可能需要在目的地提高护理水平。总体发病率也出现了类似的效果。年龄较大、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级较高、充血性心力衰竭、依赖功能状态和开放性手术是出院至更高水平护理的独立预测因素(C 统计量=0.79)。

结论

与 MIS 和会阴手术相比,开放性手术与直肠脱垂手术后更高的出院处置水平相关。未来的研究应继续确定可修改的治疗因素,以减少直肠脱垂患者的术后不良结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验