Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, Turin (Drs. Cosma, Carosso, and Benedetto).
Department of Oncology Surgery, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lyon, France (Dr. Ferraioli).
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 May;28(5):940-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.016. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
The classical surgical anatomy of the female pelvis was born with radical hysterectomy [1] and focused on the pivotal role of the lateral parametrium, a conceptually complex structure, an artifact of surgical anatomy [2] without which the whole classical model would collapse. Here, using natural planes, we tried to simplify the puzzle of the virtual spaces surrounding this structure [3,4]. With the aim of better conceptualizing the classical model of the female pelvic surgical anatomy, we broadened its perspective, which had been narrowly focused on the historic gynecologic setting, by developing a comprehensive model of pelvic retroperitoneal compartmentalization. This dissection was based on the invariable anatomic (fasciae) rather than the surgical-anatomic (parametrium) structures and aimed at providing a holistic, more user-friendly approach intended for surgical and educational purposes [5]. Because each compartment has its own surgical function (hence the name), the excavation of a single compartment may be used as a rational guide to tailor surgery to the site of the pathologic condition to be treated or the type of procedure required, whereas the compartments' sequential development may be useful in planning surgical strategies. Redefining the classical model according to the anatomic fascial planes of dissection potentially allows for an intrinsic surgical reproducibility, minimizing dissective bias. A reinterpretation of the known anatomy is required to enhance education. The breaking down of such a complex system (the pelvis) into smaller parts (compartments) will hopefully provide a useful guide for conceptualization and navigation; surgical navigation requires a holistic mental map and a few invariable anatomic reference points or landmarks.
A step-by-step laparoscopic demonstration of the fascial model, developed on a fresh frozen female pelvis, and its correlation with the classical female retroperitoneal surgical anatomy.
Cadaver Laboratory, Department of Legal Medicine, University of Turin.
The first part of the video shows the progressive development of the 3 hemicompartments in the right hemipelvis and of the fourth median compartment after the identification of 3 invariable anatomic reference points: the obliterated umbilical artery, the ureter, and the sacrouterine ligament as superficial landmarks of 3 deeper fascial-ligamentous structures: the umbilicovesical fascia, the urogenital-hypogastric fascia, and the sacropubic ligament, respectively (Figure 1). The areas delimited by the aforementioned deep fascial ligamentous structures have been designated as compartments: • the right parietal hemicompartment, so called because it is bordered by the sidewall of the pelvis, lateral to the umbilicovesical fascia • the right vascular hemicompartment, so called because of the presence of the internal iliac vessel's visceral branches between the umbilicovesical fascia and the urogenital-hypogastric fascia • the visceral compartment, so called because it contains the pelvic organs between the sacropubic ligaments • the right neural hemicompartment, so called because of the presence of the organ-specific vegetative bundles, medial to the urogenital-hypogastric fascia. The second part of the video describes the retrorectal, presacral, and retropubic connection areas between the neural, vascular, and parietal hemicompartments of each hemipelvis, justifying their overall crescent shape. Finally, the spaces of classical surgical anatomy included in each hemicompartment are listed not only according to their anatomic criterion, but also according to their functional criterion. In fact, the parietal compartment should be developed for the evaluation of the pelvic lymph node status or during exenterative and urogynecologic procedures. The vascular compartment must be prepared when sectioning of the vascular visceral pedicles at their origin is required. Development of the neural compartment is required whenever visceral neural components are to be spared. The visceral compartment has to be developed for complete organ mobilization and exposure.
Taken as a whole, our 4-compartment model of pelvic anatomic surgery is intended for use in planning and optimizing surgical strategies. Moreover, it is potentially able to simplify surgical teaching and training, allowing the fitting together of puzzle-like pieces of disjointed organ-specific retroperitoneal spaces according to their function (Figure 2). The correlation of this approach to clinical outcomes is still being determined.
女性骨盆的经典外科解剖学源于根治性子宫切除术[1],并侧重于侧旁膜的关键作用,这是一个概念复杂的结构,是外科解剖学的人为产物[2],没有它,整个经典模型就会崩溃。在这里,我们使用自然平面,试图简化围绕该结构的虚拟空间的难题[3,4]。为了更好地概念化女性骨盆外科解剖学的经典模型,我们拓宽了其视角,该视角狭隘地集中在历史妇科环境上,通过开发广泛的骨盆后腹膜分隔综合模型。这种解剖基于不变的解剖(筋膜)而不是外科解剖(旁膜)结构,旨在提供一种整体的、更易于使用的方法,用于手术和教育目的[5]。因为每个隔室都有其自身的手术功能(因此得名),所以挖掘单个隔室可以作为一种合理的指导,根据要治疗的病变部位或所需手术类型来调整手术,而隔室的顺序发展对于规划手术策略可能有用。根据解剖筋膜平面对经典模型进行重新定义,有可能实现内在的手术可重复性,最大限度地减少解剖偏差。需要重新解释已知的解剖结构,以提高教育效果。将这样一个复杂的系统(骨盆)分解为更小的部分(隔室)有望为概念化和导航提供有用的指南;手术导航需要整体的心理地图和几个不变的解剖参考点或地标。
在一个新鲜冷冻的女性骨盆上逐步展示筋膜模型,以及其与经典女性后腹膜外科解剖学的相关性。
都灵大学法医学系的尸体实验室。
视频的第一部分展示了右骨盆的 3 个半隔室和第四个中央隔室的渐进式发展,在确定了 3 个不变的解剖参考点之后:闭孔脐动脉、输尿管和骶子宫韧带作为 3 个更深层筋膜-韧带结构的浅表标志:脐膀胱筋膜、泌尿生殖-下腹筋膜和骶耻骨韧带(图 1)。上述深层筋膜韧带结构所界定的区域被指定为隔室:
右侧壁半隔室,之所以这样命名,是因为它由骨盆侧壁界定,位于脐膀胱筋膜的外侧;
右侧血管半隔室,之所以这样命名,是因为在脐膀胱筋膜和泌尿生殖-下腹筋膜之间存在髂内血管内脏分支;
内脏隔室,之所以这样命名,是因为在骶耻骨韧带之间包含盆腔器官;
右侧神经半隔室,之所以这样命名,是因为在泌尿生殖-下腹筋膜的内侧存在器官特异性植物性束。
视频的第二部分描述了每个半骨盆的神经、血管和壁半隔室之间的直肠后、骶前和耻骨后连接区域,证明了它们的整体新月形形状。最后,不仅根据其解剖学标准,而且根据其功能标准列出了包括在每个半隔室中的经典外科解剖空间。事实上,壁隔室应该用于评估盆腔淋巴结状态或在根治性和泌尿妇科手术中进行开发。当需要在其起源处切割血管内脏蒂时,必须准备血管隔室。需要开发神经隔室,以便保留内脏神经成分。需要开发内脏隔室,以便进行完全的器官移动和暴露。
作为一个整体,我们的盆腔解剖手术 4 隔室模型旨在用于规划和优化手术策略。此外,它有可能简化手术教学和培训,允许根据其功能(图 2)将互不相关的器官特异性后腹膜空间的拼图式碎片拼接在一起。这种方法与临床结果的相关性仍在确定中。