Severe muscle damage with myofiber necrosis and macrophage infiltrates characterize anti-Mi2 positive dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate clinical and histopathological findings in adult DM patients positive for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2+) antibodies compared with DM patients negative for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2-).

METHODS

Clinical data of adult DM patients, who fulfilled EULAR/ACR 2017 classification criteria, were gathered from electronic medical records of three tertiary Rheumatology Units. Histopathological study was carried out on 12 anti-Mi2+ and 14 anti-Mi2- muscle biopsies performed for diagnostic purpose. Nine biopsies from immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) patients were used as control group.

RESULTS

Twenty-two anti-Mi2+ DM [90.9% female, mean age 56.5 (15.7) years] were compared with 69 anti-Mi2- DM patients [71% female, mean age 52.4 (17) years]. Anti-Mi2+ patients presented higher levels of serum muscle enzymes than anti-Mi2- patients [median (IQR) creatine-kinase fold increment: 16 (7-37)vs 3.5 (1-9.9), P <0.001] before treatment initiation. Moreover, a trend towards less pulmonary involvement was detected in anti-Mi2+ DM (9.1% vs 30.4%, P =0.05), without any case of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. At muscle histology, anti-Mi2+ patients showed more necrotic/degenerative fibres than anti-Mi2- patients [mean 5.3% (5) vs 0.8% (1), P <0.01], but similar to IMNM [5.9% (6), P >0.05]. In addition, the endomysial macrophage score was similar between anti-Mi2+ and IMNM patients [mean 1.2 (0.9) vs 1.3 (0.5), P >0.05], whereas lower macrophage infiltration was found in anti-Mi2- DM [mean 0.4 (0.5), <0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Mi2+ patients represent a specific DM subset with high muscle damage. Histological hallmarks were a higher prevalence of myofiber necrosis, endomysial involvement and macrophage infiltrates at muscle biopsy.