Suppr超能文献

社会经济发展是否会导致绿地分配更加公平?来自中国城市的证据。

Does socioeconomic development lead to more equal distribution of green space? Evidence from Chinese cities.

机构信息

Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 48 Quincy St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 48 Quincy St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Faculty of Social Science, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 25;757:143780. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143780. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

Despite the wide implementation of green spaces to mitigate the negative effects of urbanization, there is little evidence of how cities' socioeconomic development impacts the equality of urban green space (UGS) distribution. This paper addresses this knowledge gap. Employing longitudinal data analysis and the Gini index with various socioeconomic factors, we investigated potential driving factors for UGS equality at the prefectural city level (221 out of 341 cities in total) in China during the rapid urbanization from 2000 to 2015. Results indicated that 72% of Chinese cities (160 of 221) in our sample improved their UGS equality level from 2000 to 2015, whereas 14% of cities studied (31 out of 221) declined in both quantity and equality of green space. Nationwide, economic development levels reflected by gross domestic product per capita exerted a positive and significant impact on the equality of green space distributions. Urban afforestation-related policies in China were successful in promoting the equal distribution of green space. Regional analysis indicated divergent impacts of socioeconomic development and government policies on green space equality. Other institutional development factors, such as adopting a freer land market, might harm efforts toward equal green space distribution without appropriate safeguarding regulations and enforcement powers to ensure the implementation of an equal distribution of green spaces. These findings inform decision-makers about spatial variances in the equality of green space distribution in urban areas, which demand location-oriented interventions to promote inclusive urban afforestation in Chinese cities.

摘要

尽管广泛实施了绿地来减轻城市化的负面影响,但对于城市社会经济发展如何影响城市绿地(UGS)分配的公平性,几乎没有证据。本文针对这一知识空白进行了研究。本研究采用纵向数据分析和基尼指数,结合各种社会经济因素,调查了中国 2000 年至 2015 年快速城市化期间,221 个地级市(总计 341 个城市中的 221 个)的 UGS 公平性的潜在驱动因素。结果表明,在我们的样本中,72%的中国城市(221 个中的 160 个)在 2000 年至 2015 年间提高了 UGS 公平性水平,而研究的 14%的城市(221 个中的 31 个)在绿地数量和公平性方面都有所下降。在全国范围内,人均国内生产总值反映的经济发展水平对绿地分配的公平性产生了积极而显著的影响。中国的城市造林相关政策在促进绿地公平分配方面取得了成功。区域分析表明,社会经济发展和政府政策对绿地公平性的影响存在差异。其他制度发展因素,如采用更自由的土地市场,如果没有适当的保障法规和执法权力来确保公平分配绿地,可能会损害平等绿地分配的努力。这些发现为决策者提供了有关城市地区绿地分配公平性空间差异的信息,这需要有针对性的干预措施来促进中国城市的包容性城市造林。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验