Division of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Intern Med. 2021 May 1;60(9):1349-1357. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5455-20. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Objective A kidney biopsy is generally performed in diabetic patients to discriminate between diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) and to provide more specific treatments. This study investigated the impact of anemia on the renal pathology and the clinical course in patients who underwent a kidney biopsy. Methods We reviewed 81 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent a percutaneous kidney biopsy. Patients were classified into two groups: isolated DN (DN group, n=30) and NDKD alone or concurrent DN (NDKD group, n=51) groups. The laboratory and pathological findings and clinical courses were investigated. Results In the NDKD group, membranous nephropathy was the most common finding (23.5%), followed by IgA nephropathy (17.6%) and crescentic glomerulonephritis (13.7%). In the logistic regression analysis, the absence of severe hematuria and presence of anemia were significantly associated with a diagnosis of DN. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analyses revealed improved predictive performance by adding anemia to the conventional factors (AIC 100.152 to 91.844; NRI 27.0%). The tissues of patients in the DN group demonstrated more severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) than those in the NDKD group (p<0.05) regardless of the rate of global glomerulosclerosis, and IF/TA was related to the prevalence of anemia (odds ratio: 7.31, 95% confidence interval: 2.33-23.00, p<0.01) according to a multivariable regression analysis. Furthermore, the isolated DN group demonstrated a poorer prognosis than the NDKD group. Conclusion DN is associated with anemia because of severe IF/TA regardless of the renal function, and anemia helps clinician discriminate clinically between isolated DN and NDKD.
一般来说,对糖尿病患者进行肾活检是为了区分糖尿病肾病(DN)和非糖尿病肾脏疾病(NDKD),并提供更具针对性的治疗。本研究旨在探讨贫血对接受肾活检患者的肾脏病理和临床病程的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 81 例接受经皮肾活检的 2 型糖尿病患者。患者分为两组:单纯 DN(DN 组,n=30)和 NDKD 或合并 DN(NDKD 组,n=51)。研究了实验室和病理发现以及临床病程。
在 NDKD 组中,膜性肾病最为常见(23.5%),其次是 IgA 肾病(17.6%)和新月体性肾小球肾炎(13.7%)。在逻辑回归分析中,严重血尿的缺失和贫血的存在与 DN 的诊断显著相关。Akaike 信息准则(AIC)和净重新分类改善(NRI)分析表明,将贫血纳入常规因素可提高预测性能(AIC 从 100.152 降至 91.844;NRI 为 27.0%)。DN 组患者的组织比 NDKD 组更严重的间质纤维化和肾小管萎缩(IF/TA)(p<0.05),而不管肾小球全球硬化率如何,IF/TA 与贫血的发生率相关(优势比:7.31,95%置信区间:2.33-23.00,p<0.01),这是根据多变量回归分析得出的。此外,孤立性 DN 组的预后比 NDKD 组差。
DN 与贫血相关,原因是严重的 IF/TA,与肾功能无关,贫血有助于临床医生区分孤立性 DN 和 NDKD。