Linnemann Caren, Venturelli Sascha, Konrad Franziska, Nussler Andreas K, Ehnert Sabrina
Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Institute of Physiology, Department of Vegetative and Clinical Physiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
EXCLI J. 2020 Nov 5;19:1481-1495. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-2868. eCollection 2020.
Neutrophils are the most abundant immune cells in the blood. Besides common immune defense mechanisms, releasing their DNA covered with antimicrobial proteases and histones represent another strong defense mechanism: neutrophil extracellular traps. the two most common inducers of these, so called, NETs are calcium ionophores (CI) and PMA (Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate). Following stimulation monitoring of NET release is necessary. For now, the methods of choice are quantification of free DNA by fluorescent dyes or analysis of immunofluorescence images. As a new method we tested bio-impedance monitoring of neutrophils after stimulation with the two inducers PMA and CI in gold-electrode coated plates. Bio-impedance (cell index) was measured over time. Results were compared to the monitoring of NETs by the fluorescent DNA-binding dye Sytox Green and immunofluorescence analysis. Cell index peaked about 25 min faster following CI stimulation than following PMA stimulation. The activation in Sytox Green Assay was significantly later detectable for PMA (+ approx. 90 min) but not for CI stimulation. The earlier and faster activation by CI was also confirmed by immunofluorescence staining. Our data suggest that bio-impedance measurement allows an easy online tracking of early neutrophil activation. This offers new opportunities to monitor early phases and stimuli-dependent dynamics of NETosis.
中性粒细胞是血液中最丰富的免疫细胞。除了常见的免疫防御机制外,释放覆盖有抗菌蛋白酶和组蛋白的DNA是另一种强大的防御机制:中性粒细胞胞外陷阱。这两种最常见的所谓NETs诱导剂是钙离子载体(CI)和佛波酯(PMA,12-肉豆蔻酸酯13-乙酸佛波醇)。刺激后监测NET释放是必要的。目前,首选方法是用荧光染料定量游离DNA或分析免疫荧光图像。作为一种新方法,我们在涂有金电极的平板中,用两种诱导剂PMA和CI刺激中性粒细胞后,测试了生物阻抗监测。随时间测量生物阻抗(细胞指数)。将结果与用荧光DNA结合染料Sytox Green监测NETs和免疫荧光分析进行比较。CI刺激后细胞指数达到峰值的时间比PMA刺激后快约25分钟。在Sytox Green检测中,PMA刺激后活化明显延迟(约90分钟),但CI刺激后没有延迟。CI诱导的更早和更快活化也通过免疫荧光染色得到证实。我们的数据表明,生物阻抗测量能够轻松在线追踪中性粒细胞的早期活化。这为监测NETosis的早期阶段和刺激依赖性动力学提供了新的机会。