Department of Health Policy and Management, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Extreme Events Institute, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242409. eCollection 2020.
This study assesses the dollar benefit of a neighborhood approach intervention on disaster risk reduction in small-sized, densely populated, and hazard-prone informal settlements across Latin American and Caribbean countries. We use a life satisfaction approach that assigns a dollar value to gains in wellbeing associated with the neighborhood approach intervention. Our primary data was a survey to a sample of 349 beneficiaries from small towns in Haiti, Guatemala, and Jamaica, and in major cities' surrounded areas of Peru, Colombia, and Honduras. Out of 14 interventions, we found that community empowerment, physical works in public spaces and urban gardens/food approaches produced a gain of USD1,038 to USD1,241 to individual beneficiaries. Our study suggests a large benefit associated with the neighborhood approach intervention. It also shows that the life satisfaction approach is a promising method for the valuation of non-market and public goods, especially for countries where data on hazards and risks is not available to help monetize risk reductions.
本研究评估了一种邻里方法干预措施在减少拉丁美洲和加勒比国家中小规模、人口密集和灾害多发的非正规住区的灾害风险方面的美元效益。我们采用了一种生活满意度方法,为与邻里方法干预相关的福利增益赋予了美元价值。我们的主要数据来自对海地、危地马拉和牙买加的小镇以及秘鲁、哥伦比亚和洪都拉斯主要城市周边地区的 349 名受益人的调查。在 14 项干预措施中,我们发现社区赋权、公共空间和城市花园/食品方面的物质工作为每个受益人的生活带来了 1038 美元至 1241 美元的收益。我们的研究表明,邻里方法干预措施带来了巨大的效益。它还表明,生活满意度方法是评估非市场和公共品的有前途的方法,特别是对于那些没有数据来帮助将风险降低货币化的国家。