Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242804. eCollection 2020.
Computed tomography (CT) scans represent the gold standard in the planning of functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS). Yet, radiologists and otolaryngologists have different perspectives on these scans. In general, residents often struggle with aspects involved in both reporting and operation planning. The aim of this study was to compare the completeness of structured reports (SR) of preoperative CT images and structured operation planning (SOP) to conventional reports (CR) and conventional operation planning (COP) to potentially improve future treatment decisions on an individual level. In total, 30 preoperative CT scans obtained for surgical planning of patients scheduled for FESS were evaluated using SR and CR by radiology residents. Subsequently, otolaryngology residents performed a COP using free texts and a SOP using a specific template. All radiology reports and operation plannings were evaluated by two experienced FESS surgeons regarding their completeness for surgical planning. User satisfaction of otolaryngology residents was assessed by using visual analogue scales. Overall radiology report completeness was significantly higher using SRs regarding surgically important structures compared to CRs (84.4 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001). SOPs produced significantly higher completeness ratings (97% vs. 39.4%, p<0.001) regarding pathologies and anatomical variances. Moreover, time efficiency was not significantly impaired by implementation of SR (148 s vs. 160 s, p = 0.61) and user satisfaction was significantly higher for SOP (VAS 8.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.001). Implementation of SR and SOP results in a significantly increased completeness of radiology reports and operation planning for FESS. Consequently, the combination of both facilitates surgical planning and may decrease potential risks during FESS.
计算机断层扫描(CT)是功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)规划的金标准。然而,放射科医生和耳鼻喉科医生对这些扫描有不同的看法。一般来说,住院医师在报告和手术规划方面都存在困难。本研究旨在比较术前 CT 图像的结构化报告(SR)和结构化手术规划(SOP)与传统报告(CR)和传统手术规划(COP)的完整性,以潜在改善未来的个体化治疗决策。共评估了 30 例因计划行 FESS 而接受手术的患者的术前 CT 扫描,由放射科住院医师使用 SR 和 CR 进行评估。随后,耳鼻喉科住院医师使用自由文本进行 COP,并使用特定模板进行 SOP。两位经验丰富的 FESS 外科医生根据其对手术规划的完整性,对所有放射学报告和手术规划进行了评估。通过视觉模拟量表评估耳鼻喉科住院医师的用户满意度。与 CR 相比,SR 对手术重要结构的总体放射学报告完整性明显更高(84.4%对 22.0%,p<0.001)。SOP 在病变和解剖变异方面的完整性评分明显更高(97%对 39.4%,p<0.001)。此外,实施 SR 并没有显著降低时间效率(148 秒对 160 秒,p = 0.61),而 SOP 的用户满意度明显更高(VAS 8.1 对 4.1,p<0.001)。实施 SR 和 SOP 可显著提高 FESS 的放射学报告和手术规划的完整性。因此,两者的结合有利于手术规划,并可能降低 FESS 的潜在风险。