Institute of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology and Ethology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Feb;174(2):315-326. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24183. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
We aimed to investigate molar enamel development in fossil orangutans from Guangxi and shed light on the evolution of Asian great apes.
We collected 32 fossil orangutan molars, most of which were from Guangxi apothecaries and the Guangxi Daxin Heidong cave, and prepared histological sections of each molar. We then characterized aspects of dental development, including long period line periodicity, number of Retzius lines and lateral enamel formation time, cuspal enamel thickness, and enamel formation time.
The long period line periodicity in fossil orangutans ranged from 9 to 10 days (mean, 9.09 days). The molar lateral enamel formation time ranged from 1.48 to 3.17 years (540-1,152 days). Cuspal enamel thickness in fossil orangutan molars ranged from 949 to 2,535 μm, and cuspal enamel formation time ranged from 0.64 to 1.87 years. Molar enamel formation time of fossil orangutans ranged from 2.47 to 4.67 years.
Long-period line periodicity of fossil orangutans from Guangxi was within the variation range of extant orangutans, and the average long period line periodicity (9.09 days) of fossil orangutans from Guangxi in this study was lower than the values for extant orangutans (9.5 days) and fossil orangutans (10.9 days) from Sumatra and Vietnam. Orangutan enamel thickness may have gradually decreased from the Middle Pleistocene to Holocene. Crown formation time of fossil orangutans was slightly longer than that of extant orangutans, and the M1 emergence age of fossil orangutans from Guangxi was about 4-6 years. These findings might indicate the regional difference or evolutionary changes in orangutans since Pleistocene. Dental development of the Guangxi fossil orangutans were more similar to that of Asian Miocene apes, suggesting the closer evolutionary relationship of orangutans to Miocene Asian fossil apes.
本研究旨在探究来自广西的化石猩猩的磨牙牙釉质发育情况,为亚洲大型类人猿的演化提供新的见解。
我们收集了 32 颗化石猩猩磨牙,这些磨牙大部分来自广西药铺和广西大新合东洞,我们对每颗磨牙都进行了组织学切片。我们对牙齿发育的各个方面进行了特征描述,包括长周期线周期性、Retzius 线数量和侧牙釉质形成时间、牙尖牙釉质厚度和牙釉质形成时间。
化石猩猩的长周期线周期性范围为 9-10 天(平均值为 9.09 天)。磨牙侧牙釉质形成时间范围为 1.48-3.17 年(540-1152 天)。化石猩猩磨牙的牙尖牙釉质厚度范围为 949-2535μm,牙尖牙釉质形成时间范围为 0.64-1.87 年。化石猩猩磨牙的牙釉质形成时间范围为 2.47-4.67 年。
广西化石猩猩的长周期线周期性处于现生猩猩的变异范围内,本研究中广西化石猩猩的平均长周期线周期性(9.09 天)低于苏门答腊和越南现生猩猩(9.5 天)和化石猩猩(10.9 天)的数值。猩猩牙釉质厚度可能从中更新世逐渐减少到全新世。化石猩猩的牙冠形成时间略长于现生猩猩,广西化石猩猩 M1 的萌出年龄约为 4-6 岁。这些发现可能表明自更新世以来猩猩在地域上的差异或进化变化。广西化石猩猩的牙齿发育与亚洲中新世类人猿更为相似,表明猩猩与中新世亚洲化石类人猿具有更为密切的进化关系。