单独和联合黏菌素持续头孢他啶输注对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的体外药代动力学/药效学研究。

In vitro pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of continuous ceftazidime infusion alone and in combination with colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

机构信息

Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Feb;57(2):106246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106246. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion (CI) beta-lactams for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections has not been defined. This study evaluated the efficacy of several dosage regimens of CI ceftazidime, with or without colistin, an antibiotic with a potential antibiofilm effect, against biofilm-embedded P. aeruginosa.

METHODS

Mature biofilms of the reference strain PAO1 and the clinical isolate HUB8 (both ceftazidime- and colistin-susceptible) were investigated over 54h using a dynamic CDC biofilm reactor. CI dosage regimens were ceftazidime monotherapy (4, 10, 20 and 40 mg/L), colistin monotherapy (3.50 mg/L), and combinations of colistin and ceftazidime (4 or 40 mg/L). Efficacy was evaluated by changes in logcolony-forming units (cfu)/mL and confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

At 54 h, the antibiofilm activity of ceftazidime monotherapies was slightly higher for ceftazidime 20 mg/L (-2.84 logcfu/mL) and 40 mg/L (-3.05) against PAO1, but no differences were seen against HUB8. Ceftazidime-resistant colonies emerged with 4 mg/L regimens in both strains and with other regimens in PAO1. Colistin monotherapy had significant antibiofilm activity against HUB8 (-3.07), but lower activity against PAO1 (-1.12), and colistin-resistant strains emerged. Combinations of ceftazidime and colistin had higher antibiofilm activity at 54 h compared with each monotherapy, and prevented the emergence of resistance to both antibiotics; higher antibiofilm activity was observed with ceftazidime 40 mg/L plus colistin compared with ceftazidime 4 mg/L plus colistin (-4.19 vs. -3.10 PAO1; -4.71 vs. -3.44 HUB8).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that, with %T>MIC=100%, CI ceftazidime displayed concentration-dependent antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa biofilm, particularly in combination with colistin. These results support the use of high-dosage regimens of CI ceftazidime with colistin against biofilm-associated infections with ceftazidime-susceptible P. aeruginosa.

摘要

目的

尚未明确针对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜感染的连续输注(CI)β-内酰胺类药物的药代动力学/药效学。本研究评估了几种 CI 头孢他啶剂量方案的疗效,这些方案联合或不联合多粘菌素(一种具有潜在抗生物膜作用的抗生素),以治疗生物膜包裹的铜绿假单胞菌。

方法

使用动态 CDC 生物膜反应器研究了参考菌株 PAO1 和临床分离株 HUB8(均对头孢他啶和多粘菌素敏感)的成熟生物膜,研究时间为 54 小时。CI 剂量方案为头孢他啶单药治疗(4、10、20 和 40mg/L)、多粘菌素单药治疗(3.50mg/L)以及多粘菌素和头孢他啶联合治疗(4 或 40mg/L)。通过对数集落形成单位(cfu)/mL 的变化和共聚焦显微镜评估疗效。

结果

在 54 小时时,头孢他啶单药治疗对 PAO1 的 20mg/L(-2.84 logcfu/mL)和 40mg/L(-3.05)的抗生物膜活性略高,但对 HUB8 无差异。两种菌株中,4mg/L 方案均出现头孢他啶耐药菌落,PAO1 中其他方案也出现头孢他啶耐药菌落。多粘菌素单药治疗对 HUB8 具有显著的抗生物膜活性(-3.07),但对 PAO1 活性较低(-1.12),并且出现了多粘菌素耐药菌株。与每种单药治疗相比,头孢他啶和多粘菌素联合治疗在 54 小时时具有更高的抗生物膜活性,并且防止了两种抗生素的耐药性出现;头孢他啶 40mg/L 加多粘菌素的抗生物膜活性高于头孢他啶 4mg/L 加多粘菌素(PAO1 为-4.19 比-3.10;HUB8 为-4.71 比-3.44)。

结论

本研究表明,在 %T>MIC=100%时,CI 头孢他啶对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜表现出浓度依赖性的抗生物膜活性,特别是与多粘菌素联合使用时。这些结果支持使用高剂量 CI 头孢他啶联合多粘菌素治疗对头孢他啶敏感的铜绿假单胞菌生物膜相关感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索