Infectious Diseases Department, Laboratory of Experimental Infection, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Aug;62(2):106856. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106856. Epub 2023 May 19.
Device-related infections are difficult to treat due to biofilms. In this setting, optimizing antibiotic efficacy is difficult as most pharmacokinetic/pharmacdynamic (PK/PD) studies have been performed on planktonic cells, and therapies are limited when multi-drug-resistant bacteria are involved. This study aimed to analyse the PK/PD indices of meropenem predicting anti-biofilm efficacy against meropenem-susceptible and meropenem-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Pharmacodynamics of meropenem dosages mimicking those of clinical practice (intermittent bolus of 2 g every 8 h; extended infusion of 2 g over 4 h every 8 h), with and without colistin, were evaluated with the CDC Biofilm Reactor in-vitro model for susceptible (PAO1) and extensively-drug-resistant (XDR-HUB3) P. aeruginosa. Efficacy was correlated with the PK/PD indices for meropenem.
For PAO1, both meropenem regimens were bactericidal, with higher killing for extended infusion [∆log colony-forming units (CFU)/mL 54-0h=-4.66±0.93 for extended infusion vs ∆log CFU/mL 54-0h=-3.4±0.41 for intermittent bolus; P<0.001]. For XDR-HUB3, the intermittent bolus regimen was non-active, but extended infusion showed bactericidal effect (∆log CFU/mL 54-0h=-3.65±0.29; P<0.001). Time above minimum inhibitory concentration (f%T) had the best correlation with efficacy for both strains. The addition of colistin always improved meropenem activity, and resistant strains did not emerge.
f%T was the PK/PD index that best correlated with the anti-biofilm efficacy of meropenem; it was better optimized when using the extended infusion regimen, allowing recovery of bactericidal activity in monotherapy, including activity against meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. Combining meropenem by extended infusion with colistin offered the most effective therapy for both strains. Optimizing meropenem dosing by extended infusion should be encouraged when treating biofilm-related infections.
由于生物膜的存在,与器械相关的感染难以治疗。在这种情况下,优化抗生素疗效很困难,因为大多数药代动力学/药效动力学(PK/PD)研究都是在浮游细胞上进行的,而且当涉及到多药耐药菌时,治疗方法有限。本研究旨在分析预测美罗培南抗生物膜疗效的 PK/PD 指数,针对美罗培南敏感和耐美罗培南的铜绿假单胞菌。
使用 CDC 生物膜反应器体外模型,评估模拟临床实践的美罗培南剂量(每 8 小时静脉推注 2 g ,每 8 小时持续输注 2 g 4 小时)的药效动力学,联合或不联合黏菌素,针对敏感(PAO1)和广泛耐药(XDR-HUB3)铜绿假单胞菌。将疗效与美罗培南的 PK/PD 指数相关联。
对于 PAO1,两种美罗培南方案均具有杀菌作用,延长输注时的杀菌作用更强[延长输注时的 ∆log 菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL 54-0h=-4.66±0.93,间歇推注时的 ∆log CFU/mL 54-0h=-3.4±0.41;P<0.001]。对于 XDR-HUB3,间歇推注方案无效,但延长输注显示出杀菌作用(∆log CFU/mL 54-0h=-3.65±0.29;P<0.001)。高于最低抑菌浓度的时间(f%T)与两种菌株的疗效相关性最好。黏菌素的添加总是提高美罗培南的活性,且不会出现耐药株。
f%T 是与美罗培南抗生物膜疗效相关性最好的 PK/PD 指数;当使用延长输注方案时,它可以得到更好的优化,允许在单药治疗中恢复杀菌活性,包括对耐美罗培南铜绿假单胞菌的活性。联合延长输注美罗培南和黏菌素为两种菌株提供了最有效的治疗。在治疗与生物膜相关的感染时,应鼓励通过延长输注优化美罗培南的剂量。