Suppr超能文献

拇指基底部骨关节炎夹板的临床和成本效益:一项随机对照临床试验。

The clinical and cost effectiveness of splints for thumb base osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton.

Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, University of Southampton, Oxford.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Jun 18;60(6):2862-2877. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa726.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical effectiveness, efficacy and cost effectiveness of splints (orthoses) in people with symptomatic basal thumb joint OA (BTOA).

METHODS

A pragmatic, multicentre parallel group randomized controlled trial at 17 National Health Service (NHS) hospital departments recruited adults with symptomatic BTOA and at least moderate hand pain and dysfunction. We randomized participants (1:1:1) using a computer-based minimization system to one of three treatment groups: a therapist supported self-management programme (SSM), a therapist supported self-management programme plus a verum thumb splint (SSM+S), or a therapist supported self-management programme plus a placebo thumb splint (SSM+PS). Participants were blinded to group allocation, received 90 min therapy over 8 weeks and were followed up for 12 weeks from baseline. Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) hand pain at 8 weeks was the primary outcome, using intention to treat analysis. We calculated costs of treatment.

RESULTS

We randomized 349 participants to SSM (n = 116), SSM+S (n = 116) or SSM+PS (n = 117) and 292 (84%) provided AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index hand pain scores at the primary end point (8 weeks). All groups improved, with no mean treatment difference between groups: SSM+S vs SSM -0.5 (95% CI: -1.4, 0.4), P = 0.255; SSM+PS vs SSM -0.1 (95% CI: -1.0, 0.8), P = 0.829; and SSM+S vs SSM+PS -0.4 (95% CI: -1.4, 0.5), P = 0.378. The average 12-week costs were: SSM £586; SSM+S £738; and SSM+PS £685.

CONCLUSION

There was no additional benefit of adding a thumb splint to a high-quality evidence-based, supported self-management programme for thumb OA delivered by therapists.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 54744256 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN54744256).

摘要

目的

探讨夹板(矫形器)治疗症状性基础拇指关节 OA(BTOA)患者的临床效果、疗效和成本效益。

方法

本研究为一项在 17 家英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)医院开展的、基于实用性的、多中心平行分组随机对照试验,招募了有症状性 BTOA 和至少中度手部疼痛和功能障碍的成年人。我们使用基于计算机的最小化系统,将参与者(1:1:1)随机分配到三组治疗组之一:治疗师支持的自我管理方案(SSM)、治疗师支持的自我管理方案+真拇指夹板(SSM+S)或治疗师支持的自我管理方案+安慰剂拇指夹板(SSM+PS)。参与者对分组分配情况设盲,接受 8 周、共 90 分钟的治疗,并从基线开始随访 12 周。采用意向治疗分析,以 8 周时的澳大利亚/加拿大(AUSCAN)手部疼痛作为主要结局。我们计算了治疗成本。

结果

我们将 349 名参与者随机分配到 SSM(n=116)、SSM+S(n=116)或 SSM+PS(n=117)组,292 名(84%)参与者在主要终点(8 周)时提供了 AUSCAN 骨关节炎手部指数手部疼痛评分。所有组均有改善,组间无平均治疗差异:SSM+S 与 SSM 差值为-0.5(95%CI:-1.4, 0.4),P=0.255;SSM+PS 与 SSM 差值为-0.1(95%CI:-1.0, 0.8),P=0.829;SSM+S 与 SSM+PS 差值为-0.4(95%CI:-1.4, 0.5),P=0.378。12 周的平均成本为:SSM 组£586;SSM+S 组£738;SSM+PS 组£685。

结论

对于经治疗师提供的高质量、基于证据的、支持性自我管理方案治疗的拇指 OA 患者,在该方案中添加拇指夹板没有额外获益。

试验注册

ISRCTN 54744256(http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN54744256)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验