Dietzel Joanna, Cummings Mike, Hua Kevin, Hahnenkamp Klaus, Brinkhaus Benno, Usichenko Taras I
Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
British Medical Acupuncture Society, London WC1N 3HR, UK.
Medicines (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;7(12):73. doi: 10.3390/medicines7120073.
Preoperative anxiety causes profound psychological and physiological reactions that may lead to a worse postoperative recovery, higher intensity of acute and persistent postsurgical pain and impaired quality of life in the postoperative period. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that auricular acupuncture (AA) is safe and effective in the treatment of preoperative anxiety; however there is a lack of systematic evidence on this topic. Therefore, this protocol was developed following the PRISMA guidelines to adequately evaluate the existing literature regarding the value of AA for the reduction in anxiety in patients in a preoperative setting, compared to other forms of acupuncture, pharmacological, or no control interventions and measured with questionnaires regarding anxiety and fear. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, and Scopus Database. RCTs will be included if an abstract is available in English. Data collection and analysis will be conducted by two reviewers independently. Quality and risk assessment of included studies will be done using the Cochrane 5.1.0 handbook criteria and meta-analysis of effectiveness and symptom scores will be conducted using the statistical software RevMan V.5.3. This systematic review will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AA for preoperative anxiety. Since all data used in this systematic review and meta-analysis have been published, this review does not require ethical approval. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or be presented in relevant conferences. Registration number: PROSPERO ID CRD42020.
术前焦虑会引发深刻的心理和生理反应,可能导致术后恢复较差、急性和持续性术后疼痛强度更高以及术后生活质量受损。既往随机对照试验(RCT)表明,耳针疗法(AA)治疗术前焦虑安全有效;然而,关于这一主题缺乏系统性证据。因此,本方案依据PRISMA指南制定,旨在充分评估现有文献,以探讨与其他形式的针灸、药物治疗或无对照干预相比,AA在术前减轻患者焦虑方面的价值,并通过焦虑和恐惧相关问卷进行测量。将检索以下数据库:MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、ISI科学网和Scopus数据库。若摘要为英文,则纳入RCT。数据收集和分析将由两名审阅者独立进行。纳入研究的质量和风险评估将采用Cochrane 5.1.0手册标准,有效性和症状评分的荟萃分析将使用统计软件RevMan V.5.3进行。本系统评价将评估AA治疗术前焦虑的疗效和安全性。由于本系统评价和荟萃分析中使用的所有数据均已发表,因此本评价无需伦理批准。结果可能发表在同行评审期刊上或在相关会议上展示。注册号:PROSPERO ID CRD42020。