• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后无阿片类药物管理的预测因素:SP®机器人平台的价值

Predictive factors for opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy: the value of the SP® robotic platform.

作者信息

Sawczyn Guilherme, Lenfant Louis, Aminsharifi Alireza, Kim Soodong, Kaouk Jihad

机构信息

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Unit of Predictive Onco-urology, Department of Urology, GRC N. 5, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Oct;73(5):591-599. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04038-2. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04038-2
PMID:33256359
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative factors associated with opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy in a single institution.

METHODS

From January 2019 to January 2020, data from patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy was retrospectively entered in a preapproved IRB database. Data were analyzed according to the postoperative opioid administration in hospital and/or after discharge. Robotic radical prostatectomy was performed using either the standard multi-port Da Vinci Si robotic platform with a transperitoneal approach (MP-RALP) or the novel DaVinci SP robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with an extraperitoneal approach (SP-EPP). Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery were included in the "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) protocol regardless of the surgery approach.

RESULTS

During the study period, 210 patients matched the selection criteria. Of those, 158(75%) patients received opioids during the hospital stay or after discharge and 52(25%) patients never received opioids. SP-EPP surgical approach and shorter LOS were predictors of never receiving opioids (Odds Ratio [OR]=4.97, (95% CI 1.81-14.77, P=0.002 and OR=0.56, CI 95% 0.35-0.86, P=0.011, respectively). SP-EPP surgical approach was increasing the odds of remaining opioid free whether in-hospital or after discharge (OR= 11.97, 95% CI 4.8-32, P<0.0001 and OR=11.6, 95% CI 4.6-31, P<0.0001, respectively). Finally, a high BMI increased the odds of receiving opioid in hospital or after discharge (OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, P=0.003 and OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, P=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, after robotic radical prostatectomy the use of a less invasive approach (SP-EPP), a shorter LOS and a lower BMI, were predictive of opioid-free status.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估单一机构中机器人根治性前列腺切除术后与无阿片类药物管理相关的围手术期因素。

方法

2019年1月至2020年1月,将接受机器人根治性前列腺切除术患者的数据回顾性录入预先批准的机构审查委员会(IRB)数据库。根据患者术后在医院和/或出院后使用阿片类药物的情况进行数据分析。机器人根治性前列腺切除术采用标准的多端口达芬奇Si机器人平台经腹途径(MP-RALP)或新型达芬奇SP机器人平台(美国加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔市直观外科公司)经腹膜外途径(SP-EPP)进行。无论手术方式如何,接受微创手术的患者均纳入“术后加速康复”(ERAS)方案。

结果

在研究期间,210例患者符合入选标准。其中,158例(75%)患者在住院期间或出院后使用了阿片类药物,52例(25%)患者从未使用过阿片类药物。SP-EPP手术方式和较短的住院时间是未使用阿片类药物的预测因素(优势比[OR]=4.97,95%可信区间[CI]1.81-14.77,P=0.002;OR=0.56,95%CI 0.35-0.86,P=0.011)。无论在住院期间还是出院后,SP-EPP手术方式均增加了未使用阿片类药物的几率(OR分别为11.97,95%CI 4.8-32,P<0.0001;OR=11.6,95%CI 4.6-31,P<0.0001)。最后,高体重指数增加了住院期间或出院后使用阿片类药物的几率(OR分别为=0.89,95%CI 0.82-0.96,P=0.003;OR=0.89,95%CI 0.82-0.96,P=0.002)。

结论

在本系列研究中,机器人根治性前列腺切除术后,采用侵入性较小的手术方式(SP-EPP)、较短的住院时间和较低的体重指数可预测无阿片类药物状态。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy: the value of the SP® robotic platform.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后无阿片类药物管理的预测因素:SP®机器人平台的价值
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Oct;73(5):591-599. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04038-2. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study.单纯单部位机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与多部位机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:单中心研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):964-972. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si Surgical System.经腹腔入路机器人单孔与多孔前列腺根治术与达芬奇 Si 手术系统的围手术期结局比较。
Asian J Androl. 2021 Nov-Dec;23(6):640-647. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_50_21.
4
Single port robotic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP platform: a step by step approach.达芬奇 SP 平台单孔机器人前列腺根治术:一步一步来。
Can J Urol. 2020 Jun;27(3):10263-10269.
5
Magnet-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robot: An Initial Case Series.达芬奇 SP 机器人辅助磁导航前列腺切除术:初步病例系列。
J Endourol. 2019 Oct;33(10):829-834. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0263. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.腹膜外与经腹腔单孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术:围手术期结局的比较分析。
J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1135-1140. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000700. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
7
Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2020 Sep;204(3):490-495. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000811. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Comparison Analysis.单孔与多孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术围手术期并发症:单机构比较分析。
J Endourol. 2024 May;38(5):450-457. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0652. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
9
Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique.经腹膜外单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:初步经验和技术描述。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):182-189. doi: 10.1111/bju.14885. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
10
Single-port versus multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the da Vinci SP platform.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:达芬奇 SP 平台的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate. 2022 Mar;82(4):405-414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24296. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience.盆腔淋巴结清扫术:腹膜外单孔与经腹多孔根治性前列腺切除术的比较——单中心经验
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Aug 12;67:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.110. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Impact of insufflator/aspirator versus exclusive insufflator during robotic radical prostatectomy: a comparative prospective cohort study.机器人根治性前列腺切除术中气腹机/吸引器与单纯气腹机的对比:一项前瞻性队列对比研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 19;85(5):1480-1485. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000512. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Opioids in Urology: How Well Are We Preventing Opioid Dependence and How Can We Do Better?
泌尿外科中的阿片类药物:我们在预防阿片类药物依赖方面做得如何,以及如何才能做得更好?
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Sep 15;10(3):38243. doi: 10.52965/001c.38243. eCollection 2022.