• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童青少年记忆量表(ChAMP)在小儿创伤性脑损伤后的临床应用

Clinical Utility of the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Wilson Kate, Lesica Sofia, Donders Jacobus

机构信息

Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):309-316. doi: 10.1177/1073191120976855. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1177/1073191120976855
PMID:33256457
Abstract

Sixty-one children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury completed the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP; Sherman & Brooks, 2015) within 1 to 12 months post injury. Most of the ChAMP index scores demonstrated statistically significant negative correlations with time to follow commands following traumatic brain injury. Compared with demographically matched neurologically healthy controls, selected from the ChAMP standardization sample, participants with traumatic brain injury had statistically significantly lower scores on all ChAMP index scores but sensitivity and specificity were suboptimal. We conclude that the ChAMP has modest clinical utility as part of a more comprehensive evaluation of sequelae of traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents.

摘要

61名患有创伤性脑损伤的儿童和青少年在受伤后1至12个月内完成了儿童和青少年记忆量表(ChAMP;Sherman & Brooks,2015)。ChAMP的大多数指数得分与创伤性脑损伤后执行指令的时间呈统计学显著负相关。与从ChAMP标准化样本中选取的人口统计学匹配的神经健康对照相比,创伤性脑损伤患者在所有ChAMP指数得分上均显著更低,但敏感性和特异性欠佳。我们得出结论,作为对儿童和青少年创伤性脑损伤后遗症进行更全面评估的一部分,ChAMP具有一定的临床实用性。

相似文献

1
Clinical Utility of the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童青少年记忆量表(ChAMP)在小儿创伤性脑损伤后的临床应用
Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):309-316. doi: 10.1177/1073191120976855. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
New Child and Adolescent Memory Profile Embedded Performance Validity Test.新儿童与青少年记忆测查嵌入式表现效度测验
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jul 25;38(5):782-792. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac110.
3
Derivation of New Embedded Performance Validity Indicators for the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) Objects Subtest in Youth with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤青少年的儿童和青少年记忆量表(ChAMP)物体分测验新嵌入式效标效度指标的推导
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jun 1;34(4):531-538. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy068.
4
Learning and memory profiles in youth with perinatal stroke: a study of the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP).围产期卒中后青少年的学习和记忆特征:儿童和青少年记忆特征研究(ChAMP)。
Child Neuropsychol. 2022 Jan;28(1):99-106. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2021.1957089. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
Brief memory assessment in children: can the ChAMP Screening Index detect memory impairment?儿童简要记忆评估:ChAMP 筛查指数能否检测到记忆障碍?
Child Neuropsychol. 2024 Jul;30(5):673-683. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2023.2259540. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
6
Is Computerized Cognitive Testing Useful in Children and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?计算机化认知测试对中重度创伤性脑损伤的儿童和青少年有用吗?
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Apr;23(4):304-313. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000066. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Correlates of performance on the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) in a mixed pediatric sample.混合儿科样本中儿童及青少年记忆量表(ChAMP)表现的相关因素
Child Neuropsychol. 2025 Feb;31(2):266-277. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2361123. Epub 2024 May 30.
8
The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury.脑损伤认知筛查量表(BICS)作为创伤性和非创伤性脑损伤神经心理学筛查评估工具的有效性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Apr;31(3):544-568. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1256434. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
Utility of abbreviated versions of the test of memory malingering in children with traumatic brain injury.简短版测验在创伤性脑损伤儿童中检测伪装记忆的效用。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020 Oct-Dec;9(4):355-359. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2020.1750109. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
Performance on, and correlates of, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后简易视觉空间记忆测验修订版的表现及其相关因素。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb;44(1):42-49. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2069231. Epub 2022 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus-Based Evaluation of Outcome Measures in Pediatric Stroke Care: A Toolkit.基于共识的儿科脑卒中护理结局评估:工具包。
Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Apr;141:118-132. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Jan 19.