Kobayashi Kyosuke, Kidera Kenichi, Itose Masaru, Motokawa Tetsuhiko, Chiba Ko, Osaki Makoto
Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 30;15(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02101-x.
Although a cementless modular prosthesis has shown reliable results, cases of unstable fixation and revision due to aseptic loosening were observed in our institute. The purpose of this study was to clarify the causes of unstable fixation of the prosthesis.
A total of 144 patients (154 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty using the modular prosthesis were retrospectively investigated. For the cohort study, 97 patients (104 hips) were included. The femoral component survival rate and sleeve fixation were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups, including stable and unstable fixation groups, by sleeve fixation. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared.
The Kaplan-Meier survival rate at 9 years was 93% with revision for any reason as the endpoint in study cohort. The reasons for revision were recurrent dislocation (1 hip) and aseptic loosening of the stem (5 hips). A total of 88 hips (84.6%) showed stable fixation, and 16 hips (15.4%) showed unstable fixation at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups at final follow-up. The canal flare index was significantly higher, and the canal filling ratio was significantly lower in the unstable fixation group.
Although the modified modular prosthesis was useful for treating anatomically difficult patients, we need to pay attention to both proximal/distal mismatch of the intramedullary canal and the canal filling ratio to achieve stable fixation and good long-term results.
尽管非骨水泥型模块化假体已显示出可靠的效果,但在我们研究所仍观察到因无菌性松动导致固定不稳定和翻修的病例。本研究的目的是阐明假体固定不稳定的原因。
对总共144例(154髋)使用模块化假体进行全髋关节置换术的患者进行回顾性研究。对于队列研究,纳入97例患者(104髋)。在至少5年的随访中评估股骨组件生存率和套筒固定情况。根据套筒固定情况将患者分为两组,包括稳定固定组和不稳定固定组。比较临床和影像学结果。
以任何原因翻修为终点,研究队列9年时的Kaplan-Meier生存率为93%。翻修原因包括复发性脱位(1髋)和柄的无菌性松动(5髋)。在最后随访时,总共88髋(84.6%)显示稳定固定,16髋(15.4%)显示不稳定固定。两组在最后随访时的临床结果无显著差异。不稳定固定组的髓腔扩径指数显著更高,髓腔填充率显著更低。
尽管改良的模块化假体对治疗解剖结构复杂的患者有用,但为了实现稳定固定和良好的长期效果,我们需要关注髓腔内近端/远端不匹配以及髓腔填充率。