Department of Sociology, Yale University, 493 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States.
Behavioral Health Research Division, RTI International, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 800, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103052. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103052. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
Assisted injection is a high-risk and common practice among people who inject drugs (PWID) and occurs for diverse reasons according to qualitative research. To develop interventions for reducing assisted injection risks, it is important to understand the practices of PWID who provide injection assistance, including their motivations for providing assistance.
Using follow-up data from an efficacy trial among PWID recruited in Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA (n=601), we present descriptive statistics on motivations for providing injection assistance and use multivariable logistic regression modelling to examine factors associated with these motivations.
PWID provided injection assistance most commonly to friends and acquaintances. A quarter provided assistance on a daily basis. The most common motivations for providing assistance were skill and injury prevention. PWID also provided assistance to stop pestering and for compensation in money or drugs. In separate models examining factors associated with the five main motivations, we found injury prevention to be associated with skill injecting others, neck injection, methamphetamine use, and recycling income. Pestering was associated with injury prevention, neck and hand injection, speedball use, and syringe selling. Skill was associated with injury prevention, neck and hand injection, being physically assaulted, and age. Providing assistance for money was associated with providing assistance for food or drugs, armpit injections, being female, and providing assistance more frequently. Providing assistance for drugs was associated with compensation in food or money, goofball injection, selling drugs, and panhandling.
Providing injection assistance is associated with injection needs of recipients and drug scene participation. We urgently need new interventions for reducing assisted injection risks. Since injection providers report being motivated by skill and to prevent injury, interventions such as training in safer injection techniques are likely to be met with enthusiasm.
辅助注射是注射吸毒者(PWID)中的一种高风险且常见的做法,根据定性研究,这种做法因各种原因而发生。为了制定减少辅助注射风险的干预措施,了解提供注射帮助的 PWID 的实践情况,包括他们提供帮助的动机,这一点非常重要。
我们使用在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶和旧金山招募的 PWID 参加的一项疗效试验的随访数据(n=601),介绍了提供注射帮助的动机的描述性统计数据,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型来检验这些动机相关的因素。
PWID 最常向朋友和熟人提供注射帮助。四分之一的人每天提供帮助。提供帮助的最常见动机是技能和预防伤害。PWID 还提供帮助以阻止骚扰和以金钱或毒品作为补偿。在分别检查与五个主要动机相关因素的模型中,我们发现预防伤害与技能为他人注射、颈部注射、使用甲基苯丙胺以及回收收入有关。骚扰与预防伤害、颈部和手部注射、使用快球以及出售注射器有关。技能与预防伤害、颈部和手部注射、身体受到攻击以及年龄有关。提供金钱帮助与提供食物或药物帮助、腋窝注射、女性以及更频繁地提供帮助有关。提供药物帮助与食物或金钱补偿、使用混合毒品、贩毒和乞讨有关。
提供注射帮助与接受者的注射需求和毒品使用环境有关。我们迫切需要新的干预措施来减少辅助注射的风险。由于注射提供者报告说他们的动机是技能和预防伤害,因此,像安全注射技术培训这样的干预措施可能会受到欢迎。