Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.
Behavioral and Urban Health Program, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Nov;61:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
Peer-to-peer injection (either providing or receiving an injection to/from a person who injects drugs [PWID]) is common (19%-50%) among PWID. Most studies of peer-to-peer injection have focused on receiving injection assistance, with fewer examining providing injection assistance and none considering characteristics of PWID who do both. We examined characteristics of PWID by peer-to-peer injection categories (receiving, providing, both, and neither) and determined if these behaviors were associated with receptive and distributive syringe sharing.
Los Angeles and San Francisco PWID (N = 777) were recruited using targeted sampling methods and interviewed during 2011-2013. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with peer-to-peer injection categories and logistic regression was used to examine if peer-to-peer categories were independently associated with distributive and receptive syringe sharing.
Recent peer-to-peer injection was reported by 42% of PWID (18% provider; 14% recipient; 10% both). In multinomial regression analysis, PWID reporting any peer-to-peer injection were more likely to inject with others than those who did neither. Injection providers and those who did both were associated with more frequent injection, illegal income source, and methamphetamine injection while injection recipients were associated with fewer years of injection. Injection providers were younger, had more years of injecting, and were more likely to inject heroin than PWID who did neither. In multivariate analyses, we found that providers and PWID who did both were significantly more likely to report receptive and distributive syringe sharing than PWID who did neither.
Peer-to-peer injection is associated with HIV/HCV risk. Current prevention strategies may not sufficiently address these behaviors. Modification of existing interventions and development of new interventions to better respond to peer-to-peer injection is urgently needed.
同伴间注射(无论是向还是从注射毒品者[PWID]接受注射)在 PWID 中很常见(19%-50%)。大多数关于同伴间注射的研究都集中在接受注射协助上,较少研究提供注射协助,也没有研究考虑同时提供和接受注射协助的 PWID 的特征。我们根据同伴间注射类别(接受、提供、两者兼有和两者都没有)检查了 PWID 的特征,并确定这些行为是否与接受性和分配性注射器共享有关。
使用有针对性的抽样方法招募了洛杉矶和旧金山的 PWID(N=777),并在 2011-2013 年期间进行了访谈。使用多项逻辑回归确定与同伴间注射类别相关的特征,并使用逻辑回归检查同伴间类别是否与分配性和接受性注射器共享独立相关。
42%的 PWID 报告最近有过同伴间注射(18%的提供者;14%的接受者;10%的两者兼有)。在多项回归分析中,报告有任何同伴间注射的 PWID 比没有同伴间注射的 PWID 更有可能与他人一起注射。注射提供者和两者兼有者与更频繁的注射、非法收入来源和甲基苯丙胺注射有关,而注射接受者与注射年限较少有关。注射提供者年龄较小,注射年限较长,且更有可能注射海洛因,而不是没有注射过的 PWID。在多变量分析中,我们发现提供者和两者兼有者报告接受性和分配性注射器共享的可能性明显高于没有注射过的 PWID。
同伴间注射与 HIV/HCV 风险相关。当前的预防策略可能无法充分解决这些行为。迫切需要修改现有的干预措施并开发新的干预措施,以更好地应对同伴间注射。