Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 30;10(1):20881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78093-9.
This study aimed to investigate morphological differences between idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) and secondary ERM due to peripheral break (SEPB) and to identify clinical characteristics in eyes with SEPB to facilitate peripheral retinal examination. The retrospective cross-sectional study involved 93 consecutive eyes in 91 patients who underwent ERM removal surgery. Eyes were divided into two groups: the macular pucker group and the idiopathic ERM group. En-face Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images, fundus photographs, severity of metamorphopsia (M-score) and clinical characteristics of each group were compared. ERM extent and eccentricity (ratio of the shortest and longest distances from the foveal center to the boundary) were obtained through en-face OCT imaging. Fundus photographs were used to judge whether the membrane was turbid or not. Patients with SEPB were younger than patients with idiopathic ERM (61.3 ± 7.5 vs. 66.6 ± 8.3 years; p < 0.05). Preoperative M-score and myopic refractive error, axial length were also significantly higher in the macular pucker group than in the idiopathic ERM group (all p < 0.05). There was no difference in ERM extent between the two groups. The incidence of ERM eccentricity was 23 of the 34 eyes (67.6%) in the SEPB group and 26 of the 59 eyes (44.1%) in the idiopathic ERM group (p < 0.05). The incidence of turbid ERM was 18 of the 34 eyes (52.9%) in the SEPB group and 10 of the 59 eyes (16.9%) in the idiopathic ERM group (p < 0.01). The SEPB group, compared with the idiopathic ERM group, tended to have eccentric, turbid ERM at a younger age and with more severe metamorphopsia and myopic refractive error.
本研究旨在探讨特发性视网膜内表面膜(ERM)与因周边裂孔(SEPB)引起的继发性 ERM 之间的形态差异,并确定 SEPB 眼中的临床特征,以促进周边视网膜检查。这项回顾性的病例对照研究共纳入了 91 名患者的 93 只连续眼,这些患者均接受了 ERM 切除手术。这些眼睛被分为两组:黄斑皱襞组和特发性 ERM 组。比较了两组的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像、眼底照片、变形(M 评分)严重程度和每组的临床特征。通过 OCT 图像获得 ERM 范围和偏心度(从黄斑中心到边界的最短和最长距离之比)。眼底照片用于判断膜是否混浊。SEPB 组的患者比特发性 ERM 组的患者年轻(61.3±7.5 岁 vs. 66.6±8.3 岁;p<0.05)。黄斑皱襞组的术前 M 评分和近视屈光不正、眼轴长度也显著高于特发性 ERM 组(均 p<0.05)。两组 ERM 范围无差异。SEPB 组中有 34 只眼中的 23 只(67.6%)和特发性 ERM 组中有 59 只眼中的 26 只(44.1%)存在 ERM 偏心(p<0.05)。SEPB 组中有 34 只眼中的 18 只(52.9%)和特发性 ERM 组中有 59 只眼中的 10 只(16.9%)的 ERM 混浊(p<0.01)。与特发性 ERM 组相比,SEPB 组的 ERM 更倾向于偏心、混浊,且患者更年轻,变形更严重,近视屈光不正更明显。