Suppr超能文献

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的房颤患者中,根据基线出血风险进行抗血栓治疗:在 RE-DUAL PCI 中应用 PRECISE-DAPT 评分。

Antithrombotic therapy according to baseline bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: applying the PRECISE-DAPT score in RE-DUAL PCI.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G Martino," University of Messina, Italy.

Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 May 5;8(3):216-226. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa135.

Abstract

AIMS

Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary intervention are at higher bleeding risk due to the concomitant need for oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The RE-DUAL PCI trial demonstrated better safety with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: dabigatran 110 or 150 mg b.i.d., clopidogrel or ticagrelor) compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin). We explored the impact of baseline bleeding risk based on the PRECISE-DAPT score for decision-making regarding DAT vs. TAT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A score ≥25 points qualified high bleeding risk (HBR). Comparisons were made for the primary safety endpoint International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thrombo-embolic events, or unplanned revascularization, analysed by time-to-event analysis. PRECISE-DAPT was available in 2336/2725 patients, and 37.9% were HBR. Compared to TAT, DAT with dabigatran 110 mg reduced bleeding risk both in non-HBR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.57] and HBR (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94), with a greater magnitude of benefit among non-HBR (Pint = 0.02). Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran 150 mg vs. TAT reduced bleeding in non-HBR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80), with a trend toward less benefit in HBR patients (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34; Pint = 0.08). The risk of ischaemic events was similar on DAT with dabigatran (both 110 and 150 mg) vs. TAT in non-HBR and HBR patients (Pint = 0.45 and Pint = 0.56, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PRECISE-DAPT score appeared useful to identify AF patients undergoing PCI at further increased risk of bleeding complications and may help clinicians identifying the antithrombotic regimen intensity with the best benefit-risk ratio in an individual patient.

摘要

目的

由于需要同时进行口服抗凝和抗血小板治疗,接受冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者出血风险更高。RE-DUAL PCI 试验表明,与三联抗栓治疗(TAT:华法林、氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛和阿司匹林)相比,双联抗栓治疗(DAT:达比加群 110 或 150mg 每日两次、氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)具有更好的安全性。我们根据 PRECISE-DAPT 评分探索了基于基线出血风险的决策对 DAT 与 TAT 的影响。

方法和结果

评分≥25 分即为高出血风险(HBR)。通过时间事件分析比较主要安全性终点国际血栓与止血学会大出血或临床相关非大出血以及死亡、血栓栓塞事件或计划外血运重建的复合疗效终点。在 2725 例患者中,2336 例患者可获得 PRECISE-DAPT 评分,其中 37.9%为 HBR。与 TAT 相比,达比加群 110mg 的 DAT 降低了非 HBR 患者的出血风险[风险比(HR)0.42,95%置信区间(CI)0.31-0.57]和 HBR 患者的出血风险(HR 0.70,95%CI 0.52-0.94),而非 HBR 患者的获益幅度更大(Pint=0.02)。与 TAT 相比,达比加群 150mg 的双联抗栓治疗降低了非 HBR 患者的出血风险(HR 0.60,95%CI 0.45-0.80),而 HBR 患者的获益趋势较小(HR 0.92,95%CI 0.63-1.34;Pint=0.08)。在非 HBR 和 HBR 患者中,DAT 用达比加群(110mg 和 150mg)与 TAT 的缺血事件风险相似(Pint=0.45 和 Pint=0.56)。

结论

PRECISE-DAPT 评分似乎可用于识别接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者,这些患者出血并发症风险进一步增加,并可能有助于临床医生在个体患者中确定抗栓治疗方案的最佳获益风险比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验