• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四项PRECISE-DAPT评分可识别出院后发生大出血风险增加的冠状动脉搭桥术患者。

The four-item PRECISE-DAPT score identifies coronary artery bypass grafting patients with increased risk for post-discharge major bleeding.

作者信息

Enström Philip, Martinsson Andreas, Rezk Mary, Nielsen Susanne, Björklund Erik, Landenhed-Smith Maya, Pan Emily, Jeppsson Anders

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41124, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Feb 8;11(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae060.

DOI:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae060
PMID:39165114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11805682/
Abstract

AIMS

Early identification of patients with increased bleeding risk increases the possibility to individualize antithrombotic treatment. We validated the PRECISE-DAPT score, originally developed to estimate bleeding risk in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients who underwent the first time, isolated CABG in Sweden 2009-2020 and survived until discharge were included. The four-item PRECISE-DAPT score, based on age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, pre-operative haemoglobin concentration, and previous spontaneous bleeding, was calculated in patients discharged on DAPT (n = 6838), or antiplatelet monotherapy (n = 15 406). High bleeding risk was defined as a score ≥25 in accordance with previous studies and major bleeding as hospitalization due to bleeding. Associations were assessed by C-statistics and Cox regression models. Major bleeding occurred during the first post-operative year in 130 patients (1.9%) in the DAPT group, and in 197 patients (1.3%) in the monotherapy group. The score identified 32.9% of the patients in the DAPT group and 38.2% in the monotherapy groups as having high bleeding risk. The area under the ROC-curve for the score was 0.67 (95%CI 0.62-0.72) for DAPT and 0.71 (0.67-0.74) for monotherapy. The hazard ratio for high bleeding risk vs. very low risk was 4.14 (2.07-8.26) for DAPT patients, and 4.95 (2.61-9.39) for monotherapy patients, both P < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The PRECISE-DAPT identifies patients with increased risk for major bleeding after discharge following CABG with moderate accuracy. The accuracy is comparable to what previously has been reported for patients after PCI.

摘要

目的

早期识别出血风险增加的患者可提高抗栓治疗个体化的可能性。我们在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者中验证了最初用于评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)患者出血风险的PRECISE-DAPT评分。

方法与结果

纳入2009年至2020年在瑞典首次接受单纯CABG且存活至出院的所有患者。在接受DAPT出院的患者(n = 6838)或抗血小板单药治疗出院的患者(n = 15406)中计算基于年龄、估计肾小球滤过率、术前血红蛋白浓度和既往自发性出血情况的四项PRECISE-DAPT评分。根据既往研究,高出血风险定义为评分≥25,大出血定义为因出血住院。通过C统计量和Cox回归模型评估相关性。DAPT组130例患者(1.9%)和单药治疗组197例患者(1.3%)在术后第一年发生大出血。该评分在DAPT组中识别出32.9%的患者以及在单药治疗组中识别出38.2%的患者具有高出血风险。DAPT评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.67(95%CI 0.62 - 0.72),单药治疗为0.71(0.67 - 0.74)。DAPT患者高出血风险与极低出血风险的风险比为4.14(2.07 - 8.26),单药治疗患者为4.95(2.61 - 9.39),两者P均<0.001。

结论

PRECISE-DAPT评分对CABG术后出院患者大出血风险增加的识别具有中等准确性。该准确性与之前报道的PCI术后患者相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/ba668cfb9b6f/pvae060fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/0c75674e07c1/pvae060fig1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/ee8e2e26a8ae/pvae060fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/55251ebb2eb7/pvae060fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/528c152a7d0e/pvae060fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/fdf0f5b6f63c/pvae060fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/ba668cfb9b6f/pvae060fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/0c75674e07c1/pvae060fig1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/ee8e2e26a8ae/pvae060fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/55251ebb2eb7/pvae060fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/528c152a7d0e/pvae060fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/fdf0f5b6f63c/pvae060fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ef/11805682/ba668cfb9b6f/pvae060fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
The four-item PRECISE-DAPT score identifies coronary artery bypass grafting patients with increased risk for post-discharge major bleeding.四项PRECISE-DAPT评分可识别出院后发生大出血风险增加的冠状动脉搭桥术患者。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Feb 8;11(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae060.
2
Accurate prediction of bleeding risk after coronary artery bypass grafting with dual antiplatelet therapy: A machine learning model vs. the PRECISE-DAPT score.使用双联抗血小板治疗对冠状动脉旁路移植术后出血风险的准确预测:机器学习模型与PRECISE-DAPT评分的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Feb 15;421:132925. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132925. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
3
Discordance and Performance of the ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT High Bleeding Risk Definitions After Coronary Stenting.冠状动脉支架置入术后ARC-HBR和PRECISE-DAPT高出血风险定义的不一致性及表现
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar 10;18(5):637-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.032. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
Parsimonious versus extensive bleeding score: can we simplify risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention and reduce bleeding events by de-escalation of the antiplatelet strategy?简约型与广泛型出血评分:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后我们能否简化风险分层并通过降低抗血小板策略强度来减少出血事件?
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 28;12(1):e003083. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003083.
5
DAPT Score and the Impact of Ticagrelor Monotherapy During the Second Year After PCI.DAPT 评分与 PCI 后第二年替格瑞洛单药治疗的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):634-646. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.018.
6
Derivation and Validation of the PRECISE-HBR Score to Predict Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.用于预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后出血的PRECISE-HBR评分的推导与验证。
Circulation. 2025 Feb 11;151(6):343-355. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072009. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
7
Long-Term Bleeding Risk Prediction with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated Without Revascularization.急性冠脉综合征未行血运重建治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的长期出血风险预测
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006582. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Clinical Usefulness of PRECISE-DAPT Score for Predicting Bleeding Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis From the SMART-DATE Randomized Trial.PRECISE-DAPT 评分预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者出血事件的临床价值:来自 SMART-DATE 随机试验的分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May;13(5):e008530. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008530. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Incidence of bleeding and performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting bleeding in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after treatment for acute coronary syndrome in Kenya.肯尼亚急性冠状动脉综合征治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗患者的出血发生率及PRECISE-DAPT评分在预测出血方面的表现
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04434-5.
10
Validating Utility of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score in a Large Pooled Cohort From 3 Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Studies.验证双联抗血小板治疗评分在来自 3 项日本经皮冠状动脉介入治疗研究的大型汇总队列中的效用。
Circulation. 2018 Feb 6;137(6):551-562. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028924. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Postdischarge major bleeding, myocardial infarction, and mortality risk after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后出院后大出血、心肌梗死和死亡风险。
Heart. 2024 Mar 22;110(8):569-577. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323394.
2
External validity of the PRECISE-DAPT score in patients undergoing PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PCI 患者中 PRECISE-DAPT 评分的外部效度:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Dec 14;9(8):709-721. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad063.
3
Bleeding risk and P2Y12 inhibitors in all-comer patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-centre cohort study.
所有接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的出血风险和 P2Y12 抑制剂:一项单中心队列研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Nov 2;9(7):617-626. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad048.
4
External validation of bleeding risk models for the prediction of long-term bleeding risk in patients with established cardiovascular disease.对已患有心血管疾病的患者的长期出血风险进行预测的出血风险模型的外部验证。
Am Heart J. 2023 Jun;260:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
5
Performance of the REACH, PARIS, BleeMACS, and PRECISE-DAPT scores for predicting 1-year bleeding events in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.REACH、PARIS、BleeMACS和PRECISE-DAPT评分在预测接受冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入术患者1年出血事件中的表现。
Platelets. 2022 Jul 4;33(5):719-726. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2021.1981847. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
6
Validation of the 4-Item PRECISE-DAPT Score: A SWEDEHEART Study.4 项 PRECISE-DAPT 评分验证:SWEDEHEART 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e020974. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020974. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Bleeding risk prediction in elderly patients managed invasively for acute coronary syndromes: External validation of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS scores.老年急性冠脉综合征患者有创治疗后出血风险预测:PRECISE-DAPT 和 PARIS 评分的外部验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;328:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.065. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Antithrombotic therapy according to baseline bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: applying the PRECISE-DAPT score in RE-DUAL PCI.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的房颤患者中,根据基线出血风险进行抗血栓治疗:在 RE-DUAL PCI 中应用 PRECISE-DAPT 评分。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 May 5;8(3):216-226. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa135.
9
PRECISE-DAPT score for bleeding risk prediction in patients on dual or single antiplatelet regimens: insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS and GLASSY.PRECISE-DAPT 评分用于预测双联或单联抗血小板治疗患者的出血风险:来自 GLOBAL LEADERS 和 GLASSY 的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Jan 5;8(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa106.
10
Post-Discharge Bleeding and Mortality Following Acute Coronary Syndromes With or Without PCI.急性冠状动脉综合征伴或不伴经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出院后出血和死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.031.