Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027584. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27584.
Falls and osteoporosis share the potential clinical end point of fractures among older patients. To date, few fall prevention guidelines incorporate screening for osteoporosis to reduce fall-related fractures.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for osteoporosis using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) followed by osteoporosis treatment in older men with a history of falls.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this economic evaluation, a Markov model was developed to simulate the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in a hypothetical cohort of community-dwelling men aged 65 years who had fallen at least once in the past year. Data sources included literature published from January 1, 1946, to July 31, 2020. The model adopted a societal perspective, a lifetime horizon, a 1-year cycle length, and a discount rate of 3% per year for both health benefits and costs. The analysis was designed and conducted from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020.
Screening with DXA followed by treatment for men diagnosed with osteoporosis compared with usual care.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured by cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
Among the hypothetical cohort of men aged 65 years, the screening strategy had an ICER of $33 169/QALY gained and was preferred over usual care at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY gained. The number needed to screen to prevent 1 hip fracture was 1876; to prevent 1 major osteoporotic fracture, 746. The screening strategy would become more effective and less costly than usual care for men 77 years and older. The ICER for the screening strategy did not substantially change across a wide range of assumptions tested in all other deterministic sensitivity analyses. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY gained, screening was cost-effective in 56.0% of simulations; at $100 000/QALY gained, 90.8% of simulations; and at $200 000/QALY gained, 99.6% of simulations.
These findings suggest that for older men who have fallen at least once in the past year, screening with DXA followed by treatment for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of resources. Fall history could be a useful cue to trigger assessment for osteoporosis in men.
跌倒和骨质疏松症都有导致老年患者骨折的潜在临床终点。迄今为止,很少有预防跌倒的指南将骨质疏松症筛查纳入其中,以降低与跌倒相关的骨折风险。
评估对有跌倒史的老年男性进行双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)筛查和骨质疏松症治疗的成本效益。
设计、环境和参与者:在这项经济评估中,开发了一个 Markov 模型来模拟过去一年至少跌倒一次的社区居住的 65 岁男性的主要骨质疏松性骨折的发生率。数据来源包括 1946 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 31 日发表的文献。该模型采用了一种社会视角,一个生命周期,一个 1 年的周期长度,以及健康效益和成本每年 3%的贴现率。该分析的设计和实施时间为 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日。
对 DXA 筛查后诊断为骨质疏松症的男性进行治疗,与常规护理相比。
增量成本效益比(ICER),以每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本来衡量。
在 65 岁的男性假设队列中,该筛查策略的 ICER 为 33169 美元/QALY,且在 100000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值下优于常规护理。预防 1 例髋部骨折的所需筛查人数为 1876 例,预防 1 例主要骨质疏松性骨折的所需筛查人数为 746 例。对于 77 岁及以上的男性,该筛查策略将比常规护理更有效且成本更低。在所有其他确定性敏感性分析中,该筛查策略的 ICER 在广泛的假设范围内都没有发生实质性变化。在 50000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值下,筛查在 56.0%的模拟中具有成本效益;在 100000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值下,90.8%的模拟具有成本效益;在 200000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值下,99.6%的模拟具有成本效益。
这些发现表明,对于过去一年至少跌倒一次的老年男性,使用 DXA 进行筛查并对诊断为骨质疏松症的男性进行治疗是一种具有成本效益的资源利用方式。跌倒史可能是提示男性进行骨质疏松症评估的有用线索。