• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在确定牙周炎病例时的分期和分级系统:牙周病专家、普通牙医和本科生之间的一致性和准确性。

The staging and grading system in defining periodontitis cases: consistency and accuracy amongst periodontal experts, general dentists and undergraduate students.

机构信息

Section of Periodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Division of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Feb;48(2):205-215. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13406. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13406
PMID:33260273
Abstract

AIM

The objective of this study was to evaluate consistency and accuracy of the periodontitis staging and grading classification system.

METHODS

Thirty participants (10 periodontal experts, 10 general dentists and 10 undergraduate students) and a gold-standard examiner were asked to classify 25 fully documented periodontitis cases twice. Fleiss kappa was used to estimate consistency across examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate consistency across time. Quadratic weighted kappa and percentage of complete agreement versus gold standard were computed to assess accuracy.

RESULTS

Fleiss kappa for stage, extent and grade were 0.48, 0.37 and 0.45 respectively. The highest ICC was provided by students for stage (0.91), whereas the lowest ICC by general dentists for extent (0.79). Pairwise comparisons against gold standard showed mean value of kappa >0.81 for stage and >0.41 for grade and extent. Agreement with the gold standard for all three components of the case definition was achieved in 47.2% of cases. The study identified specific factors associated with lower consistency and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis was highly consistent across time and moderately between examiners. Accuracy was almost perfect for stage and moderate for grade and extent. Additional efforts are required to improve training of general dentists.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估牙周炎分期和分级分类系统的一致性和准确性。

方法

30 名参与者(10 名牙周病专家、10 名普通牙医和 10 名本科生)和一名金标准检查者被要求对 25 例充分记录的牙周炎病例进行两次分类。Fleiss kappa 用于评估检查者之间的一致性。组内相关系数(ICC)用于计算随时间的一致性。二次加权 kappa 和与金标准的完全一致百分比用于评估准确性。

结果

阶段、程度和等级的 Fleiss kappa 分别为 0.48、0.37 和 0.45。学生对阶段的 ICC 最高(0.91),而普通牙医对程度的 ICC 最低(0.79)。与金标准的两两比较显示,阶段的 kapp 值平均值>0.81,等级和程度的 kapp 值平均值>0.41。在所有三个病例定义组成部分中,与金标准一致的病例达到 47.2%。研究确定了与较低一致性和准确性相关的特定因素。

结论

诊断在时间上高度一致,在检查者之间中度一致。阶段的准确性近乎完美,等级和程度的准确性适中。需要进一步努力提高普通牙医的培训。

相似文献

1
The staging and grading system in defining periodontitis cases: consistency and accuracy amongst periodontal experts, general dentists and undergraduate students.在确定牙周炎病例时的分期和分级系统:牙周病专家、普通牙医和本科生之间的一致性和准确性。
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Feb;48(2):205-215. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13406. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Implementation of a software application in staging and grading of periodontitis cases.牙周炎病例分期和分级软件的应用实现。
Oral Dis. 2024 Mar;30(2):719-728. doi: 10.1111/odi.14370. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
Agreement among international periodontal experts using the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontitis.国际牙周病专家使用 2017 年牙周病世界工作分类的一致性。
J Periodontol. 2021 Dec;92(12):1675-1686. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0825. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Computer-assisted periodontal classification vs manual classification among dental students: a comparative pilot study.计算机辅助牙周分类与牙科学学生手动分类的比较:一项初步研究。
Quintessence Int. 2023 Nov 28;54(10):792-801. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b4225983.
5
Intra- and inter-examiner reliability in classifying periodontitis according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases.根据 2018 年牙周病分类,对牙周炎进行分类的组内和组间可靠性。
J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Aug;49(8):732-739. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13618. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.经阴道超声“滑动征”技术的离线分析预测道格拉斯窝消失:观察者间和观察者内的可重复性。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1237-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det044. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
7
Reliability assessment of the classification for facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies (PSTDs): A multi-center inter-rater agreement study of different skill-level practitioners.评估不同技能水平从业者对种植体周围软组织裂开/缺损(PSTDs)分类的可靠性:一项多中心的评估者间一致性研究。
J Periodontol. 2022 Aug;93(8):1173-1182. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0606. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
Impact of clinical experience on the accuracy of probing depth measurements.临床经验对探诊深度测量准确性的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2008 Jul-Aug;39(7):559-65.
9
Discrepancies in periodontitis classification among dental practitioners with different educational backgrounds.不同教育背景的牙科医生在牙周炎分类方面的差异。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01371-5.
10
Perceived risk of deteriorating periodontal conditions.牙周状况恶化的感知风险。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Nov;30(11):982-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00415.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The 2018 Classification of Periodontitis: Challenges from Clinical Perspective.2018年牙周炎分类:临床视角下的挑战
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;13(8):361. doi: 10.3390/dj13080361.
2
A Study Investigating the Value of Using a Novel Mobile Application as an Adjunct to the Traditional Method of Diagnosing Periodontal Diseases.一项关于使用新型移动应用程序作为传统牙周疾病诊断方法辅助手段的价值研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70178. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70178.
3
Impact of knowledge of the 2017 classification for periodontal and peri-implant diseases on diagnostic accuracy among dental students.
2017年牙周病和种植体周围疾病分类知识对牙科学生诊断准确性的影响。
Front Dent Med. 2025 Jun 17;6:1558380. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1558380. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the Performance and Implementation of the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Survey.评估2018年牙周疾病分类的性能与实施情况:一项系统综述与调查
J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Aug;52 Suppl 29(Suppl 29):34-57. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14170. Epub 2025 May 7.
5
Knowledge, awareness and perception of dental students about the world workshop classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions 2017 - a questionnaire-based survey.牙科学生对《2017年牙周和种植周疾病及状况世界研讨会分类》的知识、认知与看法——一项基于问卷调查的研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05999-z.
6
Periodontitis: Grade Modifiers Revisited.牙周炎:再探分级修饰词。
Oral Dis. 2025 Jun;31(6):1637-1646. doi: 10.1111/odi.15297. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
7
Performance of ChatGPT in classifying periodontitis according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases.ChatGPT 在根据 2018 年牙周病分类法对牙周炎进行分类方面的表现。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 29;28(7):407. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05799-9.
8
Clinical and Demographic Profiling of Periodontal Diseases: A Retrospective Analysis Using the 2018 Periodontal Classification Algorithm.牙周疾病的临床与人口统计学特征分析:基于2018年牙周分类算法的回顾性分析
Curr Health Sci J. 2024 Jan-Mar;50(1):29-35. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.50.01.04. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
9
Ease and practicability of the 2017 classification of periodontal diseases and conditions: a study of dental electronic health records.牙周病和状况分类 2017 年版的简易性和实用性:一项牙科电子健康记录研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 28;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04385-5.
10
The new system for classification of periodontal and peri-implant disease: A questionnaire study of implementation by Swedish dental hygienists.牙周病和种植体周围疾病的新分类系统:一项关于瑞典牙科保健员实施情况的问卷调查研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2024 May 9. doi: 10.1111/idh.12816.