Suppr超能文献

实施普及婴幼儿免费学校供餐:英格兰东北部的一项试点研究,旨在探索其对小学一、二年级学生饮食摄入的影响。

Implementation of Universal Infant Free School Meals: a pilot study in NE England exploring the impact on Key Stage 1 pupil's dietary intake.

机构信息

Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, M1.151 William Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon TyneNE2 4HH, UK.

Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3167-3175. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004875. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To consider the principal effect of an interaction between year (pre- and post-Universal Infant Free School Meals (UIFSM)) and school on pupil's dietary intakes.

DESIGN

A repeated cross-sectional survey using dietary data from 2008 to 2009 (pre-) and 2017 to 2018 (post-UIFSM).

SETTING

Two primary schools, NE England.

PARTICIPANTS

Pupils aged 4-7 years (2008-2009 n 121; 2017-2018 n 87).

RESULTS

At lunchtime, there was a statistically significant decrease in pupils non-milk extrinsic sugars intake (%E NMEs) pre- to post-UIFSM (mean change -4·6 %; 95 % CI -6·3, -2·9); this was reflected in total diet (-3·8 %; -5·2, -2·7 %). A year and school interaction was found for mean Ca intakes: post-UIFSM pupils in School 2 had a similar mean intake as pre; in School 1 intakes had increased (difference of difference: -120 mg; 95 % CI -179, -62); no reflection in total diet. Post-UIFSM mean portions of yogurt decreased in School 2 and remained similar in School 1 (-0·25; -0·46, -0·04); this was similar for 'cake/pudding' and fruit.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations, these findings highlight positives and limitations following UIFSM implementation and demonstrate the role of school-level food practices on pupil's choices. To facilitate maximum potential of UIFSM, national levers, such as discussions on updating school food standards, including sugars, could consider removing the daily 'pudding' option and advocate 'fruit only' options 1 d/week, as some schools do currently. Small school-level changes could maximise positive health impacts by decreasing NMEs intake. A more robust evaluation is imperative to consider dietary impacts, equitability and wider effects on schools and families.

摘要

目的

考虑年度(UIFSM 实施前后)和学校这两个因素与学生饮食摄入之间的相互作用的主要影响。

设计

使用 2008 年至 2009 年(UIFSM 实施前)和 2017 年至 2018 年(UIFSM 实施后)的数据进行重复的横断面调查。

地点

英格兰东北部的两所小学。

参与者

4-7 岁的学生(2008-2009 年,n=121;2017-2018 年,n=87)。

结果

午餐时间,UIFSM 实施后,学生的非牛奶外源性糖(%E NMEs)摄入量明显减少(平均变化-4.6%;95%置信区间-6.3,-2.9);这反映在总饮食中(-3.8%;-5.2,-2.7%)。发现年度和学校之间的钙摄入量存在交互作用:UIFSM 实施后,学校 2 的学生的平均摄入量与实施前相似;而学校 1 的摄入量有所增加(差异:-120mg;95%置信区间-179,-62);在总饮食中没有反映出来。UIFSM 实施后,学校 2 的酸奶平均份量减少,而学校 1 的则保持不变(-0.25;-0.46,-0.04);“蛋糕/布丁”和水果也是如此。

结论

在一定的限制条件下,这些发现突出了 UIFSM 实施后的积极影响和局限性,并展示了学校层面食品实践对学生选择的作用。为了最大限度地发挥 UIFSM 的潜力,国家的政策杠杆,如讨论更新学校食品标准,包括糖的标准,可以考虑取消每天的“布丁”选择,并提倡每周 1 天“仅水果”的选择,就像一些学校目前所做的那样。小规模的学校层面的改变可以通过减少非牛奶外源性糖的摄入来最大限度地提高健康的积极影响。需要进行更有力的评估,以考虑饮食影响、公平性以及对学校和家庭的更广泛影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae1/11583185/93c079a87b0b/S1368980020004875_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验