School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia; CSIRO - Agriculture and Food, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås 1432, Norway.
Food Chem. 2021 May 15;344:128634. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128634. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
The study determined optimal parameters to four preprocessing techniques for mid-infrared (MIR) spectra of wines and grape berry homogenates and tested MIR's ability to model sensory properties of research Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay wines. Savitsky-Golay (SG) derivative, smoothing points, and polynomial order, and extended multiplicative signal correction (EMSC) polynomial were investigated as preprocessing techniques at 2, 2, 5, and 3 levels, respectively, all in combination. Preprocessed data were analysed with partial least squares regression (PLS) to model the wine sensory data and the regression coefficients of PLS calibration models (R) were further analysed with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). SG transformations were significant factors from the MANOVA that influenced R, while EMSC did not. Overall, PLSR models that predicted wine sensory characteristics gave a poor to moderate R. Consistently predicting wine sensory attributes within a variety and across vintages is challenging, regardless of using grape or wine spectra as predictors.
该研究确定了四种中红外(MIR)葡萄酒和葡萄浆果匀浆光谱预处理技术的最佳参数,并测试了 MIR 对研究赤霞珠和霞多丽葡萄酒感官特性进行建模的能力。Savitsky-Golay(SG)导数、平滑点数和多项式阶数以及扩展乘法信号校正(EMSC)多项式分别在 2、2、5 和 3 个水平上进行了研究,所有这些都是组合进行的。使用偏最小二乘回归(PLS)对预处理后的数据进行分析,以对葡萄酒感官数据进行建模,并且进一步使用多元方差分析(MANOVA)对 PLS 校准模型的回归系数(R)进行分析。SG 变换是 MANOVA 中影响 R 的重要因素,而 EMSC 则没有。总体而言,预测葡萄酒感官特征的 PLSR 模型的 R 值较差到中等。无论使用葡萄还是葡萄酒光谱作为预测因子,在品种内和跨年份一致地预测葡萄酒感官属性都是具有挑战性的。