Sievert H, Rauber K, Kunkel B, Schork A, Satter P, Riemann H, Kaltenbach M, Kober G
Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinik Frankfurt/Main.
Z Kardiol. 1987 Dec;76(12):733-6.
We examined 24 patients with 52 coronary bypass grafts, an average of 18 months after their respective operations. During the course of 1 week, a coronary angiography and a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) incorporating an intravenous injection of contrast medium were performed. Conventional coronary angiograms showed 40 bypasses as being open, ten as being occluded, and two could not be displayed at all. With the aid of digital angiography, 50 out of 52 bypasses could be classified as either open or occluded. In 44 out of 52 bypasses, DSA and coronary angiogram results were identical. Using DSA, three out of ten angiographically occluded bypasses were falsely diagnosed as being open and three out of 40 open bypasses as occluded. Two bypasses could not be interpreted due to poor picture quality. In the diagnosis "open bypass" the degree of both sensitivity and specificity subsequently amounted to 92.5%, and 70% in the diagnosis "occluded bypass". The distal part of the bypasses, as well as the proximal and distal part of the anastomoses, could not be evaluated for the most part. Furthermore, on account of the comparatively inferior quality of the pictures, detection of bypass stenosis is not reliable using digital subtraction angiography. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography may therefore serve as a screening method in the evaluation of coronary bypass grafts.
我们检查了24例接受了52次冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者,平均在各自手术后18个月进行检查。在1周的时间里,进行了冠状动脉造影和静脉注射造影剂的数字减影血管造影(DSA)。传统冠状动脉造影显示40条搭桥血管通畅,10条闭塞,2条完全无法显示。借助数字血管造影,52条搭桥血管中的50条可被归类为通畅或闭塞。在52条搭桥血管中的44条中,DSA和冠状动脉造影结果一致。使用DSA时,10条血管造影显示闭塞的搭桥血管中有3条被误诊为通畅,40条通畅的搭桥血管中有3条被误诊为闭塞。由于图像质量差,2条搭桥血管无法解读。在“通畅搭桥血管”的诊断中,敏感性和特异性随后均为92.5%,在“闭塞搭桥血管”的诊断中为70%。搭桥血管的远端以及吻合口的近端和远端在很大程度上无法评估。此外,由于图像质量相对较差,使用数字减影血管造影检测搭桥血管狭窄并不可靠。因此,静脉数字减影血管造影可作为评估冠状动脉搭桥血管的一种筛查方法。