Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
ACRF Image X Institute, the University of Sydney, Australia.
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Dec 2;65(23):235040. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb0c6.
The purpose of this work was to report on the geometric uncertainty for patients treated with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking for lung SABR to verify the accuracy of the system.
Seventeen patients were treated as part of the MLC tracking for lung SABR clinical trial using electromagnetic beacons implanted around the tumor acting as a surrogate for target motion. Sources of uncertainties evaluated in the study included the surrogate-target positional uncertainty, the beam-surrogate tracking uncertainty, the surrogate localization uncertainty, and the target delineation uncertainty. Probability density functions (PDFs) for each source of uncertainty were constructed for the cohort and each patient. The total PDFs was computed using a convolution approach. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to quantify these uncertainties.
For the cohort, the surrogate-target positional uncertainty 95% CIs were ±2.5 mm (-2.0/3.0 mm) in left-right (LR), ±3.0 mm (-1.6/4.5 mm) in superior-inferior (SI) and ±2.0 mm (-1.8/2.1 mm) in anterior-posterior (AP). The beam-surrogate tracking uncertainty 95% CIs were ±2.1 mm (-2.1/2.1 mm) in LR, ±2.8 mm (-2.8/2.7 mm) in SI and ±2.1 mm (-2.1/2.0 mm) in AP directions. The surrogate localization uncertainty minimally impacted the total PDF with a width of ±0.6 mm. The target delineation uncertainty distribution 95% CIs were ±5.4 mm. For the total PDF, the 95% CIs were ±5.9 mm (-5.8/6.0 mm) in LR, ±6.7 mm (-5.8/7.5 mm) in SI and ±6.0 mm (-5.5/6.5 mm) in AP.
This work reports the geometric uncertainty of MLC tracking for lung SABR by accounting for the main sources of uncertainties that occurred during treatment. The overall geometric uncertainty is within ±6.0 mm in LR and AP directions and ±6.7 mm in SI. The dominant uncertainty was the target delineation uncertainty. This geometric analysis helps put into context the range of uncertainties that may be expected during MLC tracking for lung SABR (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02514512).
本研究旨在报告多叶准直器(MLC)跟踪治疗肺部 SABR 患者的几何不确定性,以验证该系统的准确性。
17 名患者参与了这项 MLC 跟踪治疗肺部 SABR 的临床试验,在肿瘤周围植入电磁信标作为目标运动的替代物。研究中评估的不确定性源包括替代物-靶标位置不确定性、射束-替代物跟踪不确定性、替代物定位不确定性和靶标勾画不确定性。为队列和每位患者构建了每个不确定性源的概率密度函数(PDF)。使用卷积方法计算总 PDF。95%置信区间(CI)用于量化这些不确定性。
对于队列,替代物-靶标位置不确定性 95%CI 为 ±2.5mm(-2.0/3.0mm)在左右(LR)方向,±3.0mm(-1.6/4.5mm)在上下(SI)方向,±2.0mm(-1.8/2.1mm)在前后(AP)方向。射束-替代物跟踪不确定性 95%CI 为 ±2.1mm(-2.1/2.1mm)在 LR 方向,±2.8mm(-2.8/2.7mm)在 SI 方向,±2.1mm(-2.1/2.0mm)在 AP 方向。替代物定位不确定性对总 PDF 的影响最小,宽度为±0.6mm。靶标勾画不确定性分布的 95%CI 为±5.4mm。对于总 PDF,LR 方向的 95%CI 为±5.9mm(-5.8/6.0mm),SI 方向的 95%CI 为±6.7mm(-5.8/7.5mm),AP 方向的 95%CI 为±6.0mm(-5.5/6.5mm)。
本研究通过考虑治疗过程中发生的主要不确定性源,报告了 MLC 跟踪治疗肺部 SABR 的几何不确定性。整体几何不确定性在 LR 和 AP 方向上为±6.0mm,在 SI 方向上为±6.7mm。主要不确定性是靶标勾画不确定性。这项几何分析有助于了解 MLC 跟踪治疗肺部 SABR 过程中可能出现的不确定性范围(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT02514512)。